May 1, 2008 12:01
How about a property-tax holiday for the residents of Brooklyn, funded by the state of Wyoming?
A reader whose office happens to be a couple of doors down from mine writes, with regard to caitlilly's plaint about life in rural Wyoming in a time of a high gas prices:
Is "tough s***" an acceptable answer?OK, maybe I wouldn't put it that harshly, although having spent half my life in the Detroit area I think I have a fair enough right to make the comment. But the tactful way of phrasing it is: don't lots of people live in places where their choice of location and lifestyle leaves them vulnerable to shifts in various markets?
For instance, people who live in urban areas, especially on the coasts, left themselves vulnerable to the dramatic rise in real estate costs and rents over the last several years. Should they get a tax credit? A property tax holiday?
Of course, the counterargument is that some people want to give people living in expensive places a bailout in the form of the mortgage bailout, which in my uninformed opinion is no better... but in any case I wonder how warm Wyoming residents are to helping foot the housing bills of people living in $500,000 condos.
About The Curious Capitalist
Justin Fox is TIME's business and economics columnist. This is his blog. About the Authors
Barbara Kiviat just celebrated her 5-year anniversary covering business and economics for TIME magazine. About the Authors
Recent Posts
The Curious Capitalist Archives
Blog Roll
- Going Private
- Calculated Risk
- Nicholas Carr
- Brad DeLong
- Econbrowser
- Econlog
- John Gapper
- Herb Greenberg
- Paul Kedrosky
- Ezra Klein
- Adam Lashinsky
- Michael Mandel
- Greg Mankiw
- Marginal Revolution
- Matt McAlister
- Megan McArdle
- Mike Moffatt
- Floyd Norris
- Roger Parloff
- James Pethokoukis
- Barry Ritholtz
- Felix Salmon
- Mark Thoma
- Amit Varma

Reader Comments (2)
By the way, having gone and read the beginning of caitlilly's original comment, I would agree with him?/her? about one thing: I don't like the idea of demonizing people because they own SUVs, as if they are less "deserving" of a tax break. If a gas-tax holiday is a bad idea, it's a bad idea regardless of who owns what kind of car.
I don't like the quasi-moralistic notion that choosing to buy an SUV makes you less entitled to help. I just don't also like the quasi-moralistic idea that the "need" of people to drive because they live in a rural area is more worth subsidizing than the "need" of someone to pay a high rent to live in a coastal city.
Posted by James Poniewozik | May 1, 2008 12:20 PM
Clinton's now saying that her tax holiday is intended to benefit mostly truckers and long distance commuters. At least now we have a target for her pitch.
Posted by Ffred | May 1, 2008 4:10 PM