May 6, 2008 2:27
The libertarian case for Hillary
Fresh off his rousing defense of the McCain-Clinton gas tax pander (it's better than price controls), my future co-author Bryan Caplan now makes a more general case for why his fellow objectivists/anarchists should consider voting for Hillary Clinton:
In terms of policy, Hillary and Obama look extremely similar to me; I prefer either to McCain because I think they're more likely to get the U.S. out of Iraq. But Hillary worries me a lot less than Obama because leaving Iraq is likely to be her only major political success. Hillary has a built-in army of enemies, and she's making more enemies every day. (I've talked to Obama supporters who hate her more than Rush Limbaugh does!) Obama, in contrast, is genuinely likeable. At least during his honeymoon period, he might be able to unite the country behind a long list of "progressive" reforms. And that's what makes him dangerous to liberty.
About The Curious Capitalist
Justin Fox is TIME's business and economics columnist. This is his blog. About the Authors
Barbara Kiviat just celebrated her 5-year anniversary covering business and economics for TIME magazine. About the Authors
advertisement
Recent Posts
- Schwarzman's accounting trial balloon gets thoroughly aerated
- What Starbucks should be doing is charging to use the bathroom
- Danes still the happiest, even if they won't say hello at the grocery store
- Why free trade and globalization aren't quite the same thing
- Sheldon Adelson finally begins to penetrate the national consciousness
The Curious Capitalist Archives
July 2008
Choose a day to view events.
<< Previous Months
Blog Roll
- Going Private
- Calculated Risk
- Nicholas Carr
- Brad DeLong
- Econbrowser
- Econlog
- John Gapper
- Herb Greenberg
- Paul Kedrosky
- Ezra Klein
- Adam Lashinsky
- Michael Mandel
- Greg Mankiw
- Marginal Revolution
- Matt McAlister
- Megan McArdle
- Mike Moffatt
- Floyd Norris
- Roger Parloff
- James Pethokoukis
- Barry Ritholtz
- Felix Salmon
- Mark Thoma
- Amit Varma

Reader Comments (1)
I finally saw "Sicko" for the first time last night. I thought it did a pretty good job of debunking the argument that universal (a.k.a. "socialized") medicine is dangerous to life and liberty. Unless, of course, what you really want is the liberty to 1) be denied service, 2) go bankrupt, and/or 3) lower your life expectancy.
Posted by Ffred | May 6, 2008 4:46 PM