Monday, November 26, 2007 at 9:41 am
Adventures in Donor Servicing
What's more embarassing than doing a museum show devoted to a private collection that your museum hopes someday to get? Doing the show and not getting the collection. Ask the Boston Museum of Fine Arts.
advertisement
Looking Around
RSS Feed
Daily Email
Recent Posts
Looking Around - TIME.com Archives
Archives
Blogroll
- Alecsoth.com
- Art Law Blog
- Art to Go
- Artblog.net
- Artsjournal.com
- artsjournal.com/aboutlastnight
- artsjournal.com/artopia
- artsjournal.com/culturegrrl
- artsjournal.com/man
- C-monster
- Daily Dose of Architecture
- Eric Etheridge
- Hatchets and Skewers
- Illicit Cultural Property
- Looting Matters
- Plain Sight
- The Exhibitionist
- The New Modernist
- The Walker Art Center
More TIME Blogs
Top Stories
- States Financial Outlook: Getting Worse Fast
- Big Three Bailout Hits Some Speed Bumps in Washington
- Heeding No Authority, Israeli Settler Youth Rampage in Hebron
- Laugh and the World Laughs With You: How Happiness Spreads
- Robert Gates: Secretary of Hilarity!
- A Pirate Ransom Deal: Who Gets the Money?
- Lara Croft Is Back and Remarkably Well-Preserved
- Oil-Price Drop Forces Big Energy to Retreat
- Even Google Gets Frugal in the Recession
- After Mumbai, Can the US Cool India-Pakistan Tension?
advertisement
Monday, November 26, 2007 at 11:19 am
It's the clearest possible example of why these collector-driven shows are unethical -- and possibly even illegal. (See The Nature Conservancy scandal.)
Still, I can't help but notice: A few weeks ago you pooh-poohed the National Gallery of Art's near-identical enterprise. Surely it's as bad for the NGA to do it as it is for the MFAB? Here's my post, which has a link to yours.