The Middle East Blog, TIME

News Flash: Muslim Denounces Terrorism!

Among the unfortunate examples of Muslim bashing in the U.S. are Op-Eds of Thomas Friedman, who has sometimes used his very influential platform as a best-selling pop author, prestigious Middle East maven and New York Times pundit to accuse Muslims of some sort of collective responsibility for extremism and terrorism. One of his recurring points, as he wrote two months ago after the latest terrorism episode in Britain, is that "hundreds of Muslims have committed suicide amid innocent civilians...without generating any vigorous, sustained condemnation in the Muslim world."

Maybe it hasn't been up to Friedman's standards of being vigorous and sustained. But Muslim leaders and ordinary Muslims have consistently condemned extremism and terrorism. I agree if he is saying that the Muslim world can and must do more to advance unambiguous moral imperatives. On the other hand, many could (and do) turn around and say that Americans, including the U.S. government and Friedman too, are at fault for not making a vigorous and sustained criticism of Israel's occupation policies.

So, some folks including Friedman might want to take a look at the latest Muslim denunciation, not only of extremism and terrorism, but of Osama bin Laden himself. The interesting twist this time is that the critic is Saudi preacher Salman al-Audah, a leader of Saudi Arabia's important movement of politicized Wahhabis known as Sahwa Islamiya. Al-Audah is a major influence on Bin Laden, who often cited Audah's political views and condemned the Saudi government for imprisoning him for them. When one of Bin Laden's men gave me a copy of Bin Laden's letter to King Fahd in 1996, I noticed that it was dedicated to Audah and another Sahwa scholar.

Audah chose to issue his attack on Bin Laden on the Cornerstone program of Middle East Broadcasting, one of the prominent Arab satellite channels seen throughout the Arab world, on Sept. 14, coinciding with the sixth anniversary of 9/11 as well as the start of the holy month of Ramadan. That qualifies as pretty vigorous. He also has posted the letter on his website, in Arabic as well as English, which I reckon qualifies as a form of sustainment.

Here it is in full (and bold-faced, so nobody has any trouble reading it):

Brother Osama:

How much blood has been spilled? How many innocent children, women, and old people have been killed, maimed, and expelled from their homes in the name of “al-Qaeda”?

Are you happy to meet Allah with this heavy burden on your shoulders? It is a weighty burden indeed – at least hundreds of thousands of innocent people, if not millions.

How could you wish for that? – after knowing that Allah’s Messenger said: “Whoever as much as kills a sparrow in vain will find it crying before Allah on the Day of Judgment: ‘My Lord! That person killed me in vain. He did not kill me for needful sustenance.”

This religion of ours comes to defense of the life of a sparrow. It can never accept the murder of innocent people, regardless of what supposed justification is given for it.

Didn’t you read where the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “One of the prophets once sat under a tree and was bitten by an ant. Because of this, he burnt the ant’s nest. Thereupon, Allah inspired to him: ‘Why not only the one ant?’ ” [Sahîh Muslim]

Allah revealed to that prophet: “What? Just because one ant had bitten you, you have set fire to an entire nation that extols Allah’s glory!” [Sahîh Muslim (2241)]

If this is the case for a nest of ants, consider how much worse it must be to visit harm upon human beings.

Who is responsible for all of those young Muslim, who are still in the bloom of their youth, with all the zeal of their age, who have strayed down a path they have no idea where it is headed?

The image of Islam today is tarnished. People around the world are saying how Islam teaches that those who do not accept it must be killed. They are also saying that the adherents of Salafi teachings kill Muslims who do not share their views.

However, the reality of Islam is that our Prophet (peace be upon him) did not kill the treacherous hypocrites in his midst, even though Allah had revealed to him who they were and informed him that they were destined for the deepest depths of Hell. Why did he stay his hand? He gave the following reason: “I will not have people saying that Muhammad kills his companions.”

Brother Osama, what happened on September 11 – crimes that we have condemned vociferously since that very day – was the murder of a few thousand people, possible a little less than three thousand. This is the number that dies in the airplanes as well as in the towers. By contrast, Muslim preachers – who remain unknown and unsung – have succeeded in guiding hundreds of thousands of people to Islam, people who have ever since been guided by the light of faith and whose hearts are filled with the love of Allah. Isn’t the difference between one who kills and one who guides obvious?

Our Lord tells us: “Whosoever kills a human being for other than manslaughter or corruption in the Earth, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind, and whoso saves the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the lives of all mankind.” [Sûrah al-Mâ’idah: 32]

Guiding one soul to knowledge and faith is a momentous achievement. It is what will earn us great blessings.

Brother Osama, what is to be gained from the destruction of entire nations – which is what we are witnessing in Afghanistan and Iraq – seeing them torn them with plague and famine? What is to be gained from undermining their stability and every hope of a normal life? Three million refugees are packing into Syria and Jordan alone, not to mention those who are fleeing to the East and the West.

The nightmare of civil war which now reigns supreme in Afghanistan and Iraq brings no joy to the Muslims. When the Prophet (peace be upon him) heard about a man named Harb (meaning “war” in Arabic), he promptly changed his name to something else, because the Prophet hated war.

Allah says: “Fighting is prescribed for you, though you detest it.” [Sûrah al-Baqarah: 216]

War is something hateful that must only be resorted to under the most dire and compelling of circumstances when no other way is found.

Who stands to benefit from turning a country like Morocco, Algeria, Lebanon, or Saudi Arabia – or any other country for that matter – into a battlefield where no one feels safe? Is the goal to obstruct the government? Is that, then, the solution for anything?

Is this the plan – even if it is achieved by marching over the corpses of hundreds of thousands of people – police, soldiers, and civilians, even the common Muslims? Are their deaths to be shrugged off, saying: “They will be resurrected in the Hereafter based on the state of their hearts.”

Indeed, all of those who are slain will be resurrected based on the state of their hearts. The question we must ask ourselves, however, is in what state are we going to be resurrected? How are we going to find ourselves when we meet our Lord? How will it be for someone who has all those countless deaths weighing down upon him, whether he wants to own up to them or not?

The concern for conveying Islam’s message to humanity is one that can influence others and convince them. This is a far greater and far weightier concern than that of using brute force and violence to bend others to one’s will. “Allah sent His Messenger (peace be upon him) as a guide for humanity, not as a tax collector.” as `Umar b. `Abd al-`Azîz used to say.

Who is responsible – brother Osama – for promoting the culture of excommunication which has torn families asunder and has led to sons calling their fathers infidels? Who is responsible for fostering a culture of violence and murder that has led to people to shed the blood of their relatives in cold blood, rather than nurturing the spirit of love and tranquility that a Muslim family is supposed to have?

Who is responsible for the young men who leave their mothers crying; who abandon their wives; whose small children wake up every day asking when daddy is coming home? What answer can be given, when that father may very well be dead, or missing with no one knowing of his fate?

Who is responsible for Western governments pursuing every charitable project in the world, so that the orphans, the poor, and the needy throughout the globe are deprived of food, education, and other essential needs? Who is responsible – brother Osama – for filling the prisons of the Muslim world with our youth, a situation which will only breed more extremism, violence, and murder in our societies?

Muhammad (peace be upon him) – my source of guidance as well as yours – is what he came with not enough for you? He was sent as a mercy for all humanity. Allah says: “And We sent you merely as a mercy for all humanity.” [Sûrah al-Anbiyâ’: 107]

The word “mercy” is not to be found in the lexicon of war. Where is the mercy in murdering people? Where is the mercy in bombing places? Where is the mercy in making people and places into targets? Where is the mercy in turning many Muslim countries into battlefields?

The Prophet (peace be upon him) brought all of Arabia under his sway without a single slaughter, despite all of the battles that were waged against him. The number of people who were killed during the twenty-three years of his mission were less than two hundred people. The Muslims who were killed during that time by their enemies were many times in excess of that number.

What do a hundred people in Algeria, or double that number in Lebanon, or likewise in Saudi Arabia hope to achieve by carrying out acts of violence – or as they say, suicide attacks? These acts are futile.

Let us say – purely hypothetically – that these people manage to take power somewhere in the world. What then? What can people who have no life experience hope to achieve in the sphere of good governance? People who have no knowledge of Islamic law to support them and no understanding of domestic and foreign relations?

Is Islam only about guns and ammunition? Have your means become the ends themselves?

That ideology that so many young people have embraced in many parts of the world, is it revelation from Allah that cannot be questioned or reconsidered? Or is it merely a product of human effort that is subject to error and to being corrected?

Many of your brethren in Egypt, Algeria and elsewhere have come to see the end of the road for that ideology. They realize how destructive and dangerous it is. They have also found the courage to proclaim in their writings and on the air that they were mistaken and that the path they had been on was the path of error. They admit that it cannot lead to anything good. They have sought Allah’s forgiveness for what has passed and have expressed their sincere regrets for what they had done.

Those with brave hearts need just as much to have courageous minds.

Do you not hear the voices of the pious scholars, those who worship Allah day and night and are truly heedful of Allah – don’t you hear them crying out with the very same words that the Prophet (peace be upon him) used when Khâlid b. al-Walîd, the commander-in-chief of his army, acted in error: “O Allah! I plead my innocence to You from what Khâlid has done.”

These same words still echo after 1400 years in the cries of the scholars of Islam: “O Allah! I plead my innocence to You from what Osama is doing, and from those who affiliate themselves to his name or work under his banner.”

Life, Osama, should not be a single lesson. We must face numerous lessons throughout our lives, and these lessons are of a great variety.

I am no different than that of a lot of other people who are concerned with Muslim affairs. My heart pains me when I think of the number of young people who had so much potential – who would have made such great and original contributions to society, who had so much to offer that was constructive and positive – who have been turned into living bombs.

Here is the vital question that you need to ask yourself and that others have the right to demand and answer for: What have all these long years of suffering, tragedy, tears, and sacrifice actually achieved?

I ask Allah to bring everyone together upon the truth and right guidance. I pray that he guides us all to what pleases Him.


--By Scott MacLeod/Cairo

| Sphere Related Blogs & Articles |

Reader Comments (25)

Joe:

Even a person in field of Anthar-apology will have a difficult time to extend apology to potential several hundred millions of offended individual one at a time, Friedman should change his name to Freedperson and move on from Israelites point of view, I do not see any denunciation coming from Palestinians anytime soon!

tom:

Scott,

When you meet this man, Salman al-Audah, next, tell him a man in Portland Oregon said thank you.

Nathan:

That was beautiful.

If only the world had more leaders as wise as this man. The world would follow someone like him. I know I would.

Sherif:

"I ask Allah to bring everyone together upon the truth and right guidance. I pray that he guides us all to what pleases Him."
Amen, no more wars would be a start(or the end), which starts by using the brain he gave us
instead of following our egos. That goes for all.

plermite:

If Ben Laden hurts so much Islam, why this gentle Saudi preacher doesn’t issued a fatwa against Ben Laden?

Sherif:

Don't blame the Saudi's, blame our media for not informing you, but then again what is Scott doing?

Anonymous:

There may yet be hope for this world. Thank you from Canada, Salman al-Audah.

ross:

Well said by Salman al-Audah, however Mr Scott don't use this to inject your own criticism of others, because you then show you don't understand the true meaning of what this religious man says. As one Saudi editor had pointed out in the past when also reacting to events over the last few years, not all Muslims are terrorists but all suicide bombers are Muslim.

ross:

Sorry, correct quote of Abd al-Rahman al-Rashid, September 23, 2004 was: ''It is certainly true that not all Muslims are terrorists, however, sadly we say that the majority of terrorists in the world are Muslims. ''
http://www.worldpress.org/Mideast/1941.cfm

Nathan:

"It is certainly true that not all Muslims are terrorists, however, sadly we say that the majority of terrorists in the world are Muslims."

The real quote has a completely different connotation than "all suicide bombers are Muslim". This is a perfect example of how people can twist reality to fit their own prejudiced views.

Extremism is a symptom of poverty, ignorance, and despair, and if the majority of terrorists of today's world are Muslims, then it speaks volumes about the conditions within the majority of Muslim countries. This is a problem for the world to solve, not just Muslims alone. The international community carries a significant amount of blame. Many of the enduring conflicts in the Middle East today can be traced back to the Paris peace talks at the end of WW1 when the Ottoman empire was carved up and distributed among the victors as spoils of war.

ross:

Hi, I don't want to start a separate thread to what the essence should be of the article, that there are certainly Muslims who abhor what a very small minority has done.
However, Nathan, I misquoted and so went directly to find the correct source, not because I twist reality to fit my own prejudiced views. Wake up.
Whatever the reasons, and there are certainly many, it needs to stop and that is where I totally agree with this wise man and Saudi preacher Salman al-Audah.

Nathan:

True. You did post the source. But I'm still not sure how that quote relates to the "true meaning" of what Al-Audah said. What is his true meaning, if indeed there is more than one? What he said seems pretty straight forward to me.

It also seemed to me that you were using the quote about the majority of terrorists being Muslim to suggest it is solely a Muslim problem and you support Friedman's opinion that Muslims aren't doing enough to solve it. If I am wrong, then I apologize.

Allen:

News Flash: Muslim Denounces Terrorism!

Yeah it only took six years... what a moderate.

jati hoon:

Brillintly expressed, true human feeling.

Bill:

The fact that this is newsworthy, Mr. Scott, proves Friedman's point. This kind of denouciation appears to be the exception rather than the norm in the wider Muslim community. Audah's condemnation is certainly appreciated, but I wonder why it has taken him over 6 years to condemn a man whose clear link to terrorism have been clear for more than twice that length. Extremists from other religious communities are roundly condemned by the believers they are supposedly fighting for; why should the Muslim world be any exception? Perhaps we don't hear enough condemnation from the Muslim community due to its lack of institutional structure, or perhaps it is because many in the Muslim community sympathise with terrorists' resistance against former colonialists and their own oppressive governments, even though the aims of these terrorists may very well set them back further.

Joe:

If your parents didn't teach you anything about fallacy of wars, don't blame the rest of us!

To Allen and Bill:

I think you missed the sarcasm in the title. As with the rest of humanity most muslim scholars and preachers have been condemning 9/11 and terrorism since it happened (there are nutjobs among muslims as there are among other faiths but as in other faiths they are very much a minority). The problem with Friedman is that he prefers not to listen - and then claim because he didn't pay attention it didn't happen. Some time ago Juan Cole , the mideast scholar at the University of Michigan got tired off answering Friedman clones with lists of condemnations by muslims of al-qaeda so he just put a permanent link to a list on the side of his website Informed Comment. He did this a while back so the list is probably a bit old - but I suppose that answers your criticism even better than a more up to date list.

Saudis generally publish their condemnations in Saudi media, Iranians in Iranian media and so on. You only get to hear about it if someone translates it or reports about it. As there has been very little reporting about these condemnations - not sexy enough I suppose - I can't blame your response. That is not an excuse for Friedman as he passes himself off as a expert on foreign affairs.

Kurundu Ali:

No muslim in his right mind will accept What Al Qaeda has being doing as Islam. I just hope we are not going to wake up 30 years from now and be informed that Osama.....agent.

Rajai:

Scott McLeod has done a great service in promoting dialogue between the West & the Islamic World in publishing and circulating such a great representative message by authoritative Moslem Scholar Sheikh Audeh. The message of Sheikh Audeh, coming late as is, is both: foreceful and it encapsulates the essence and the true spirit of Islam, or any universal faith intended for the enlightenement of humanity.

As to Thomas Friedman whom I never read any more any of his articles, he is an opportunist double standard journalist. Thomas Friedman, who, while frequently roamming the Moslem Arab countries with first hand knowledge of the facts and who is always received with opulence by their leaders, could have played a far more constructive role emphasizing the positives in the manner journalist Scott McLeod has done with the example of this publication.

True also, with all fairness, that condemnation by independent learned Moslem scholars of Usama Bin Ladin and the abhorrent criminal methods of his followers should have come out earlier, more collectively and more assertively.

No doubt the prevailing worsening state of polarization caused by the State Terrors that persistently and systematically carried out by some nations under the cloak of fighting world terrorism has further fuelled mistrust and deep sense of alienation among marginalized Moslems. The terrible injustices committed daily and flagrantly; the preponderance of abject poverty, along with ignorance are factors that play big in the hands of Usama Bin Ladin's brand of terrorism.

Nathan:

I don't see why someone has to denounce something they had nothing to do with. People like Thomas Friedman accusing all Muslims of not condemning terrorism is like the Republicans trying to force the Democrats to distance themselves from the Moveon.org ad. It's not helpful.

Rajai:

Mr. Mathan has a valid point. My apologies.

Wendell:

WOW! Now, if Karen Hughes was competent, we would be doing everything to get this the widest possible dissemination. There are, after all, a billion Muslims.

This is nearly the equivalent of one of Brezhnev's mentors (Suslov?) recanting! Once, the U. S. had people that would have known how something like this could be used to draw others away from, in that case, Communism's call.

Now? Ah, well...

Anonymous:

I think that terrorist actions are actually helping american imperialism e.g. sectarian violence in iraq is an secret american govt agenda to divide iraq into 3 mini-states. Afghanistan is already becoming "western" and american morals and values are being promoted in the country.

I do believe that Saudi/wahabi orientated 'scholars' should openly condemn and still need to condemn terrorist actions. It would be nice to hear a condemnation of terror at this years hajj sermon in which millions of haji's attend; where keeping in mind that there is massive media coverage.

We also need to keep in mind the other forms of terror like that created by rich nations in the WTO. Poor farmers in the third world are forced to sell their produce at ridiculously cheap prices so that citizens places like Britain can save pennies. There needs to be free and fair trade.

We need to end all injustices and this is everybody's responsibility.

MuslimfromUKSays:

Terrorism is to Islam what adultery is to marriage.

muslimBro:

Osama was condenmed by Imaam Ibn Baaz(late head of scholars council in saudiarai) several years prior to 9/11 as you know it. and this ideology of irhaab(terrorism) had been refuted by leading muslims scholars for several years. For hundreads of years this ideology have been refuted by leading scholars in this time. refer to this website they have downloadable pdf to the book
http://www.thewahhabimyth.com/

Post a comment


About The Middle East Blog

Tim McGirk

Tim McGirk, TIME's Jerusalem Bureau Chief, arrived in the Middle East after covering Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Read more


Scott MacLeod

Scott MacLeod, TIME's Cairo Bureau Chief since 1998, has covered the Middle East and Africa for the magazine for 22 years. Read more


Andrew Lee Butters

Andrew Lee Butters moved to Beirut in 2003, and began working for TIME in Iraq during the Fallujah uprising of 2004. Read more


 RSS Feed

AddThis Feed Button

Daily Email

Get Middle East Blog in your inbox and never miss a day:
 
Delivered by   FeedBurner
advertisement

The Middle East Blog Archives

May 2008
Choose a day to view events.

<< Previous Months

        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31