December 14, 2007 3:55
Khatami's Comeback?
The buzz of Tehran this week is the rebuke of President Ahmadinejad and the hard-line policies he represents by his normally cautious, mild-mannered predecessor, Mohammed Khatami. Speaking to students at Tehran University on Student Day in Iran, where protesters recently called Ahmadinejad a "dictator," Khatami delivered backhanded criticism on various international and domestic issues, like presidential provocations that have increased international pressure on Iran and the jailing of Iranian students.
Interestingly, Khatami also issued a frontal attack on Ahmadinejad's Robin Hood economic policies, suggesting they were designed to win popularity but in fact were ill-conceived, could wreck the economy and therefore are harmful to the poorer classes Ahmadinejad claims to champion. "It is this kind of 'justice' that which makes the concept null and void of all essence," he said. "It is this 'justice' which squanders the resources of the nation and spreads poverty, the same resources which ought to be used create wealth.
Khatami said political freedom was more important than slogans about economic justice. In that vein, he sharply criticized the Guardian Council, the body that has routinely disqualified Iranian reformists from participating in elections and thereby tilted the outcome in favor of conservatives and hard-liners. "What right do some have to make decisions on behalf of the people and disqualify those trusted by the people on the grounds that their eligibility was not approved by six or 12 individuals?" Khatami asked.
Khatami, it seems, is out to change his reputation in Iran for being a well-meaning politician who lacks political courage. His remarks suggest he will take a leading role in mobilizing reformists against Ahmadinejad and his fellow hard-liners in parliamentary elections scheduled for March.
Although it has not coalesced into a formal alliance, there has been a lot of talk that Khatami will be part of a three-way anti-Ahmadinejad bloc that includes two other major figures, former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and former Speaker Mehdi Karroubi, both of whom lost to Ahmadinejad in the last presidential contest.
There's no sign that Khatami will actually be a candidate for president once again in the 2009 election, but he would stand a good chance to defeat Ahmadinejad if he did run. Despite widespread disillusionment that he did not fulfill his promise as president, Khatami remains one of the country's most popular figures. In the 1997 and 2001 elections, he captured more than 20 million votes each time in the first and only rounds of voting. By contrast, Ahmadinejad won less than 6 million votes in the first round of the 2005 election, and 17 million in his victorious runoff. Since leaving the presidency, Khatami established the International Institute for Dialogue among Cultures and Civilizations.
An Iranian leader with that kind of orientation can do a lot to improve Iranian relationships with the rest of the world. Khatami did achieve something in that respect as president, significantly mending ties with the Arab world and Europe. He failed to make much progress with the U.S., though. Despite his government's cooperation in the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001, President Bush decided to confront Iran as one of the three designated states in his Axis of Evil speech three months later. That confrontation continues and it's one the current Iranian president relishes.
--By Scott MacLeod/Cairo
Reader Comments
Posted by Gabistan
December 14, 2007
if the US and Israel leave the Iranians alone, they will work it out for themselves... they arent idiots. Hopefully this stirring is enough to keep the war mongerers at bay.
Posted by Reza
December 15, 2007
Khatami and Ahmadinejad are two faces of the same coin...they are like good cop and bad cop, the reality is that they are both imposters, using god's name to stay in power
Posted by danial
December 15, 2007
Both of them are bad cop.
Posted by Anonymous
December 15, 2007
For Iranians, the hard transition to democracy would go through reform in Iran; Of course reformists have deep roots in the educated Iranians (those who voted for preseident Khatami and unfortunately because of their high immaterialized expectations did not participate actively in 2005). Recent remarks of president Khatami were really encouraging and bald and hope he participates actively if he wants this transition happens without chaos in Iran.
Posted by Mehran Tehran
December 15, 2007
I quite agree with both Gabistan and Anonymous.
First of all Iranians, by large majority, want a change and are fighting for it at every opportunity they get. But if USA and the rest left us alone and weren't sucked into regimes propaganda the move to democracy and normalization would be much faster.
Any verbal attack any sanctions and any creation of a situation that the regime can claim that “the great enemy(ies) are threatening us..” is another hurdle in the way of advancement of moderation and democracy in Iran. I am sure we all know that all totalitarian regimes would love an imaginary enemy let alone if the greatest military power in the world openly threatened you that’s a God send gift to the regime (Remember / read 1984 by George Orwell). (Incidentally George Bush and friends are also using the same technique at home and profiting form the shadow of an imaginary powerful enemy).
Secondly the transition would come from within Iran like USSR, not from outside opposition parties or attack by USA or a plan for regime change by any foreign nation.