May 7, 2008 2:40
Beirut Demo Turns Violent

Soldiers separating Shia Muslim neighborhoods from Sunni Muslim neighborhoods in West Beirut where a trade union demonstration and strike over wages tuned into an opposition protest
On a Beirut scale of civil disturbances, today's demonstration by labor unions demaninding better wages was relatively mild. Still, the sound of rifle fire and rocket explosions ecohing through the streets of Lebanon's capitol is just one sign that the once dormant protest movement to bring down the Lebanese government is coming back to life.
Not only were there no trade unions in sight, but instead of a planned Labor Day-style parade, the demonstration turned into a series of burning tire and rubble barricades guarded by young men belonging to the Shia Muslim opposition parties Hizballah and Amal. This in turn prompted many residents from Sunni Muslims neighborhoods to mobilize in support of the Lebanese government, and prevent the strike from shutting down their areas. Riots broke out in at least one area where Sunni and Shia neighborhoods meet.
This seemed to be a replay of demonstrations in January of 2007, when the Hizballah led opposition movement shut down Beirut with a much larger and more coordinated show of force. When that action too spun out of control, sparking riots in some of the same neighborhoods where unrest occurred today, the opposition backed down, rather than risk pushing the country closer to civil war.
Whether today's unrest presages a return to turblent street politcis remains to be seen. But the deadlock between Lebanon's opposition -- supported by Syria and Iran -- and the government -- supported by the United States -- remains as intractable as ever. Each side accuses the other of violating the democratic norms of the Lebanese state, which divides power among its main religious groups. The government objects to HIzballah's existence as an armed anti-Israeli militia and state-within-a-state. On the other hand, the Hizballah-led opposition accuses the government of collaborating with Israel and of illegally holding onto power despite the absence of any Shia Muslim ministers, as mandated by the constitution. The political crises is such that he country has been unable to hold elections for president since last fall, and is still without a head of state.

A Lebanese journalist was caught in the middle of a clash between street gangs
--Andrew Lee Butters/Beirut
About The Middle East Blog
Tim McGirk, TIME's Jerusalem Bureau Chief, arrived in the Middle East after covering Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Read more
Scott MacLeod, TIME's Cairo Bureau Chief since 1998, has covered the Middle East and Africa for the magazine for 22 years. Read more
Andrew Lee Butters moved to Beirut in 2003, and began working for TIME in Iraq during the Fallujah uprising of 2004. Read more
Reader Comments (2)
All this violence over some phone lines... go figure. I just want to know what the rationale is for the Lebanese government to dismantle those telephone lines other than pressure from outside sources?
In any case, if the telephone poles are taken down, then Hezbollah will likely go at it like we do in some parts of the US and bury those lines in the ground. So, what is the point? To make it even harder to eavesdrop on them? It's funny how politicians never seem to think ahead more than one step at a time. If I was the opposition, I would simply let them maintain their thinking that they have a closed-circuit telecommunications system while wiretapping them 24/7.
On a side note, how insane is that cameraman to the left of the picture?? Everyone knows that uniforms like that are bullseyes are Israeli tanks. When they see the word "Press", they rationalize that it means to press the trigger ;)
Posted by nk+ | May 8, 2008 9:33 AM
All this violence over some phone lines... go figure. I just want to know what the rationale is for the Lebanese government to dismantle those telephone lines other than pressure from outside sources?
In any case, if the telephone poles are taken down, then Hezbollah will likely go at it like we do in some parts of the US and bury those lines in the ground. So, what is the point? To make it even harder to eavesdrop on them? It's funny how politicians never seem to think ahead more than one step at a time. If I was the opposition, I would simply let them maintain their thinking that they have a closed-circuit telecommunications system while wiretapping them 24/7.
On a side note, how insane is that cameraman to the left of the picture?? Everyone knows that uniforms like that are bullseyes are Israeli tanks. When they see the word "Press", they rationalize that it means to press the trigger ;)
Posted by nk+ | May 8, 2008 9:34 AM