November 28, 2007 12:10
I Saw The Golden Compass
There was an advance screening last night. I always forget how awful advance screenings are -- a few people who go are fans, but most of the crowd are either college or high school kids who are just after a free movie, and don't care what they're seeing, or crazed shut-ins who somehow get on the lists for these events, for whom this is their only pleasure in life, and who bring garbage bags full of home-made food into the theater, and yell at you if you leave before the end of the closing credits.
Anyway, the movie. I had just reread the book for a piece about Philip Pullman that will be out on Friday, and I'd also seen a 20-min. clip reel a few weeks ago that showcased the special effects. I was very, very excited. Perhaps too excited.
I'll cover the good things first, which is easy, because there were only two of them. One, the casting. Nicole Kidman makes a perfect Mrs. Coulter: she's hot and she's cold. Daniel Craig was manly and smart and vaguely amoral as Lord Asriel. Eva Green, sporting a dead-on Marina Sirtis Betazoid accent, was somehow ethereal and badass simultaneously as witch Serafina Pekkala. (Though you kind of kept expecting her to make out with Lord Asriel, since Green was Craig's Bond girl in Casino Royale.) Newcomer Dakota Blue Richards, as Lyra, does what she has to, i.e. stands up straight and looks a lot like Nicole Kidman. Best-in-show goes to the unstoppable Ian McKellen voicing the armored bear Iorek Byrnison.
Good thing number two: the daemons. I had always thought Pullman's trilogy was basically unfilmable because of them. I mean, every time you have 5 people in a room there's a herd of animals in there with them? And nobody can touch anybody else's animal. How's that supposed to work? But they make it work. All the daemons look alert and interesting, like they belong in the scene. And the actors do a good job of pretending they're, you know, actually there. There's a nice, showy moment when Mrs. Coulter slaps her monkey demon across the face, then turns to the camera, so that you see the fading red finger-marks on her own cheek.
And now the bad things, which pretty much includes everything else. The screenplay is appalling: there's so much plot to be gotten through that nobody has time for anything but exposition. It's like somebody bent your arm behind your back and angrily frog-marched you through the novel. People are constantly popping up unexpectedly in convenient places for no reason, just because the filmmakers didn't have time to explain how they got there. The screenwriter -- also the director, Chris Weitz -- abandons almost all of Pullman's eloquence in favor of sheer speed. Look, it's the Gyptians! It's Farder Coram -- hey, there's Lee Scoresby! You see these people for one incredibly awkward 30-second scene, in which they give a wooden little monologue about who they are and where Lyra's supposed to go next, then they're gone.
That means the characters have no time to rest and be people, and the world has no time to feel real and rich. And it means compressing key scenes into movie-drivel shorthand -- fans of the book will never stop cringing at the handling of Pullman's best horror-moment, when we meet a child who's been the victim of intercision. (He doesn't even have his fish!) Everything becomes cliché action-movie bombast. It's not enough for Lyra to escape from Bolvangar, she has to destroy the Oblation Board's evil machinery in a hilarious Bond-via-Austin Powers explosion. It doesn't help that Weitz -- who did great, tender, funny work adapting Nick Hornby's About a Boy -- has no gift for filming action...
So to sum up: there were some nice things, but mostly I thought it was fairly terrible. I haven't even gotten into the very worst part, which is the ending, which I won't mention partly to avoid spoilers, but partly because it's so bad it's literally unmentionable. My chief worry going into the movie was that they would soft-pedal the anti-church aspects of the novel. Which they did, but quite tastefully -- that didn't bother me at all.
And it's not that the movie isn't worth seeing. Nothing could have stopped me from seeing it -- if this post had fallen back through time, and I'd read it yesterday, I would still have gone to see the movie, if only for the daemons and the bears. I just wish it were better. It's been mentioned in the press that Tom Stoppard wrote a screenplay version of The Golden Compass that the studio discarded. When I interviewed Pullman I tried to get him to talk about it -- he said it was more 'philosophical.' I'm sure there's another universe in which the Stoppard version was filmed instead. Oh, for a subtle knife, that I could travel to that happy world.
About Nerd World
Lev Grossman blogs about anything and everything that could be plausibly labeled geeky--science fiction, fantasy, video games, comic books, tech stuff, and so on. If it could get you beaten up in junior high, it's fair game. About the Author
Matt Selman has worked on eleven seasons and over two hundred episodes of The Simpsons. He currently serves as an Executive Producer. About the Author


Reader Comments (18)
Perhaps Chris should have gone on strike!
Posted by anonymouse | November 28, 2007 1:24 PM
I'm still going to go see it, but your review is very... disheartening. I love those books. And I was very worried with how they'd do the end. So now you have me very worried.
I'm glad they handled the daemons and the bears alright, but they're only one piece of the puzzle. Like saying that the LotR movies handled the Hobbits great but got everything else wrong.
Oh well. I'll see it. But now I'll be ready for dissapointment, I guess. But I don't think it'll stop me from gasping: "what?!" indignantly throughout the movie.
Posted by Kit | November 28, 2007 1:32 PM
"It's like somebody bent your arm behind your back and angrily frog-marched you through the novel."
That's great. I now know exactly what kind of movie it is.
Posted by Church | November 28, 2007 2:26 PM
Oy! I just looked up another review where one of the commenters spoiled the ending. And crap. Now I see what you mean, Lev!
Posted by Kit | November 28, 2007 2:28 PM
-- if this post had fallen back through time,
Now that brings to mind a good topic for a possible future post. Of the movies that you've seen this year, are there any that would have like to have gotten a message about from your future-self. And if so, what? (For example, next time skip the extra-large soda before going to that Return of the King screening.)
Posted by SpotWeld | November 28, 2007 3:46 PM
"There's so much plot to be gotten through that nobody has time for anything but exposition."
You just described the HP:GoF movie to me. You could have copied your review and put in some HP terms, and it'd be dead on. Except for the good parts. I'm struggling to think of good parts of the HP4 movie.
It disappoints me that Pullman has been so blunt with his hatred for CS Lewis and the Narnia books.
I thought the previews made it look like a canned fantasy adventure, though I'll still probably read the series.
Posted by Dave | November 28, 2007 4:55 PM
Well, when I first heard that they were making a movie from Golden Compass, I did wonder - they're not very movieable books, I think.
Posted by Susan | November 28, 2007 8:23 PM
Congrats on seeing the golden compass!
Posted by CCNA Exploration | November 29, 2007 8:51 AM
thanks for saving me a trip. nothing i hate more than wasting a trip to the theatre. i'll wait for netflix to hate it.
Posted by blog nerd | November 29, 2007 8:59 AM
I'd still watch it at the theatre, the bears and the daemons would look better there.
Posted by chryssie | November 29, 2007 1:09 PM
The only way to do the Golden Compass properly would be to get some smarty-pants, artsy-fartsy director who knows all about themes and character development and crap, who'd be able to pinpoint the critical elements of the story.
And of course this is the kind of movie smarty-pants artsy-fartsy directors won't touch with a ten foot pole, because it's not about existentialist jugglers in France.
Unless (I'm having a brainstorm here) they could have gotten Guillermo del Toro to do it. We already know he can do monsters and creepy stories about little girls very well. Yeah. That would have been nice.
Posted by Cliff | November 29, 2007 2:26 PM
or Alfonso Cuaron...he's definitely bankable and knows how to condense big stories effectively...
Posted by Corey | November 29, 2007 3:50 PM
Hey Kit,
How did they get "everything wrong" in LoTR?!?
Posted by Jacob Blues | November 29, 2007 10:14 PM
he didn't say that they did get everything wrong in LOTR, but rather said that if all they had gotten right was the hobbits would be the same thing as saying all they got right in this movie was the daemons.
Posted by stephen | November 30, 2007 12:07 AM
Can some one let a 63yr male tips on a Good action or a Fun comedy
Thank you
Bob
Posted by bobstevens | December 1, 2007 12:00 AM
I've just seen it too, and agree with everything you said, it was just poor. I agree, a completely fantastic cast, but a woeful adaptation, and the ending, when Dakota starting saying that painful little monologue I knew it was coming I just didn't want to believe it!
Posted by sw | December 6, 2007 6:08 PM
Just got back from the theater... the movie was probably one of the worst book to film adaptations... in the history of book to film adaptations. All I have to say is when the screen went black, half the theater said "WHAT THE @#$%" No lies there folks, I rest my case.
Posted by Katelyn | December 8, 2007 2:55 AM
From what I understand, they filmed the movie with the same timeline as the book. But then they changed their mind and, well, sliced it up. Decided to use some of the 'later' footage (to avoid spoilers) in the 2nd movie. If there will be a 2nd movie. I'm thinking there won't be. Which means this movie was just a horrible mess that doesn't explain anything.
I heard a story that Chris Weitz went to the Arctic to write the script and when he plugged in his laptop on the cruise ship, it fried. So the script was written by hand. My friend jokingly said that, at the end of it all, he must have dropped all those handwritten pages, lost a few, and then shuffled them all together randomly. And thus the script was born.
Posted by Kit | December 11, 2007 9:23 AM