Pollster.com's Disclosure Project

Good post, this is necessary for nerds like me to actually give some credence to polls.

My guess based on my experience of attending IA Caucuses: Past Caucus Goers are more informed.

Ana -
Fair Warning Alert: this is not directly about pollster, but I wanted to get some visibility for my point.

To wit: this is in no way whatsoever a defense of Iran's president, but at least he came and took uncensored questions from a foreign audience. Has Bush ever done that? His press conferences are exercises in MSM cowering; his public events have audiences that rigorously pre-screened. He will not face questions from ordinary Americans, never mind an audience of Iranian students (or any other nationality's, for that matter.)

Can't someone bring this point to a wider audience?

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/25/opinion/25brooks.html?_r=2&n=Top/Opinion/Editorials%20and%20Op-Ed/Op-Ed/Columnists/David%20Brooks&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin

Uh oh.

Wankette fell down and can't get it up!

"have a screen more aggressively"...? Could you please clarify, Ana?
Also, will pollster.com be talking to the campaigns themselves? They are also fond of trumping up their momentum while shading their methodologies. Thx.

"John Edwards does better against Clinton as the percentage of past caucus goers increases."

It really doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this one out. Past caucus-goers are presumably more informed about politics. And they are likely more invested in advancing progressive issues. Not "further left". Just more committed to their political beliefs.

Clinton supporters tend not to get beyond the most superficial of reasons for supporting her: E.g. "She's smart", "We get Bill Clinton as a package", or "Things were better in the '90s."

For people who actually have been paying attention, Clinton has remarkably little executive experience, she has lousy foreign policy judgment, and she is way to quick to "compromise".

In fact, I'm really surprised that Clinton's numbers haven't fallen more as the Democrats' frustrations with the current Congressional leadership mount. Of the leading candidates, Hillary most strongly stands for the type of pre-emptive capitulation tendencies for which Reid and Pelosi are being currently blamed .

I watched Pelosi take on the Weenie Wolf over SCHIP. WW of course relied on his interview with 'tuna and powdered milk' Leavitt to support the Pres. and the neocons.

Question 1: How will the avoidance of the Jena, LA controversy with the Black Caucus taking it to the Hill effect the meme of Obama [Ophra and Tyra aside] and Hil [Bill in LR, AR]?

Question 2: Anybody listening to Ahmadinejad at the UN? If one were on the fence and believed in the accuracy of speeches, Bush comes across as the Baboon Buffoon. He's framing Bush's Power Coalition as the destructor of the family and the degradation of women. Hits the 'greed factor' and use of 'weapons' framing it in the 'avoiding international law' that they wrote while increasing the arms race with ease. A big hit on national sovereignty and the failure of the 'powers' following WWII to go forward from Medieval thoughts creating hopelessness. Even uses the phrase "Fair and Sustainable Relations" while invoking God and morality, human values and ethics, love and affection. "Coalition for Peace"

mirc mirc mırc mirç mırç mirc indir mırc indir mirc mırc mırç mirc yükle mirc download kameralı mirc islami sohbet dini sohbet islami çet islami chat kelebek kelebek sohbet kelebek mirc kelebek indir kelebek script kameralı mirc kameralı chat mirc mırc kameralı sohbet kameralı chat chat chat yap chat sohbet chatsohbet çet çet odaları çet odası sohbet kanalları sohpet sohbet odaları sohbet kanalları yarışma soru cevap sevgili sevgili bul arkadaş arkadaş ara arkadaş bul arkadaşlık bedava sohbet erkek arkadaş bayan arkadaş oto araba mp3 mp3 indir astroloji gazeteler gazete marifetname bedava domain map

nice
ماسنجر messenger توبيكات توبك