TIME - Person of the Year - Did we get it right?

Talkback

Did we get it right?

TIME's Person of the Year is the person or persons who most affected the news and our lives, for good or ill, and embodied what was important about the year. We've had our say, now it's your turn:
• Do you agree or disagree with TIME's choice?
• Who should we have chosen?
• Who gets your vote for Person of the Year?

Posted by Sally Savage in Grand Blanc
Oh please! Cleverness, deception and out right hate for democracy is not a value that is valued by the majority of the people of the United States! I am very disappointed in your choices. So it really doesn't matter who you select, just so it gets press. Well, you should know who gets press and why.

Posted by Vincent Pagnoni in Glen Allen, VA
Well, can't say I'm really surprised by your choice - I figured Al Gore was a lock for this with the year he has had but at least he was a runner up. I recently started a Time subscription after much thought and after just two issues I no longer bother reading it, I can't get through all the left wing/Democrat nonsense and support that you blindingly provide. So while I may choose to be ignorant by not reading Time, you choose to demonstrate your ignorance of the world we live in by putting it into printed word.

Posted by nathan bottles in fort myers, fl
Another Pathetic choice, naturally, from a pathetic liberal magazine. Why don't you pack up your stuff and move to another country where you'll be Happier... Suggestion- Russia!

Posted by Philip Richard in Sandia, Tx.
Your comment Very obvious who reads Time magazine...the winner,and first and third runners up...all socialist communist in their core beliefs. It is a sad day in America when these men drape the cover of a leading magazine as heroes and idols for our young to look up to.

Posted by Snowman in North Pole
Thanks everyone for posting your intelligent commets. I suggest you keep them rolling and contact Time dorectly all day long. Good work!

Posted by Gil in HIISR
I disagree that Putin is chosen to be The man of the Year. you rewarded a person who is by far a symbol of corruption , who leads an aggressive governorship.

its lame and pathetic decision not to say -even dangerous act ,as for by giving a non-acceptable behaviour and ruling you legitimise ppl to act as such, all the more so had of states ..

Awful decision !!

Posted by Darren in Kuala Lumpur
Of course Putin had a dramatic effect on the world since becoming the leader of Russia, that will hold for some time, but you're comparing that with the possible (likely) disastrous effects that climate change will cause across the world for an indefinite time in the future? It was Al Gore who woke so many up to this fact, which he is why he was honored with part of the Nobel Prize. You seriously missed the big picture on this one.

Posted by Dino in Las Vegas, Nevada
I suggest that everyone who has a negative feeling towards Time's choice, go out and buy as many copies of the magazine at your local store as you financially can. At 5:00 pm central time, lets all burn the magazine, tape it and post it on You Tube. That is my plan. Lets get the word out.

Posted by Judith Harris in Al Gore
My first impression, how can you pick such a miserable person? He is still a communist. Why would you give him any attention, it just encourages bullies! Nothing noble in his spirit!

Al Gore has most affected us in so many ways, all positive. He was a good VP as you can be in that position, lost with grace although unfairly, and went on to continue his work concerning the world's environment. All noble examples that lift and give hope.

I believe you did this to be sensational, to sell your mag and that's a sell out to the people of the world. Shame on you, shame, shame, shame.

Posted by Linda in Bakersfield
I say "Shame on You"! How dare you when our own President has had to make the toughest choices ever. There is just no loyalty anymore. THIS IS AMERICA!

Posted by D.E. Wagner in Russell,KS
I think the general consensus of the people that responded to this article have it right. You don't have a clue. Vladimir Putin has stepped back in time and done nothing but flex musle. It's the oil, that's the only reason Russia has once again become a big world player. However, he might well be the man to start WW III. And then there is Al Gore, the green man. He is up to his eye brows in carbon credits and all that is about is making money. Isn't this the guy that started the internet?

Posted by Judith Harris in Webster, NY
My first impression, how can you pick such a miserable person? He is still a communist. Why would you give him any attention, it just encourages bullies! Nothing noble in his spirit!

I believe you did this to be sensational, to sell your mag and that's a sell out to the people of the world. Shame on you, shame, shame, shame.

Posted by Eunice in Miami
David in Utah and other facists posting here..

Actually i disagree with you. Time is not a liberal magazine, it doesn't support progessive views. Time is more incline to your facists agenda reasong i canceled my subscription.

and

David, Al gore cleaning the earth for the devil? Are you kidding me? Wow, you shocked me. I am a hard working mother of two, christian and married for 12 years. I support Al Gore on his quest to make the environment safer, Are my children and I the devil?

Your extreme views are shocking shocking shocking.. - Speechless..

Posted by Tim Nelson in Clarksville, TN
Number 1 and number 4 are communist leaders and your number 1 has just sent his first NUCLEAR shipment to IRAN! Not to mention they are the sole country blocking the independence of Kosovo. It's not their country and not their decision to make their decision to make, we didn't need England's permission and didn't even have the support of all the people in our own colonies but we still declared independence. And why did we do that? Because it is people's God-given right! Number 4, the communist leader of China...hmmm, yeah, common sense will tell you that is a horrible choice. Now how about your number 2, Al Gore. Well he tried to lay claim to the invention of the internet which still makes me laugh, and his whole global warming thing? Why is it that nobody is reporting the findings of NASA that indicate that global warming is WRONG!!!? Why will nobody report on that? Because the people who are behind the idea are the ones in power in this country for starters. Mr. Gore did not deserve the Nobel prize for something that is a farse, so take him off there too. And number 3 is a writer, absolutely no disrespect intended but she's a writer! How in the world does that qualify someone for any "Person of the Year"? Finally we get to a real choice on your list, Commanding General David Petraeus. He took the reigns of an extremely difficult war and is doing a superb job. Killings are down, which means peace is on the rise. Is it taking a long time? Yes it is but let's not forget something people, in this country we declared our independence in 1776 and we did not come up with a Constitution until 1787 (11 years!) and we had a lot of fighting of our own going on at the time. They seem to be doing pretty good in Iraq and the Chain of Command has plenty to do with that. Then again, so do the people at the bottom of that food chain, and so do the people back Home. If you have to choose someone from your list he seems like the logical choice, but...Here's an idea, "Person of the Year"---Americans! We stand up for other people, we take care of everybody else, and we stand up for what we believe in (whether I agree with you or not I respect you for having a backbone and at least choosing a side). So how about that one? Keep it in mind for next year...America...We're a hell of a "Person"!!!!!!Period, end of story.

Posted by Sime in Riyad .K.S.A
Ithink Time chose some o f the most affected persons in the news but from my point of view i think there are people on the shadow .I think ALGORE deserived to be the person of 2007,he did magnificent job cconcering global warming and enviroment and am sure he' ll be happier with this prize rather than run The White House.I don't think Time are reasonable to choose Putin who is lately try to show that he is (ZORO) ,how come he is the most influential leader can not be unless (APPRIL FOOL). If i can tell Time standerd for next year as follow: Mr.W Bush,Castro or Arab Countery leaders. They may choose Sadam Husain as unforgetable honorable man in history.

Posted by Eunice in Miami
David in Utah and other facists posting here..

Actually i disagree with you. Time is not a liberal magazine, it doesn't support progessive views. Time is more incline to your facists agenda reasong i canceled my subscription.

and

Your extreme views are shocking shocking shocking.. - Speechless..

Posted by Brad in Las Vegas
Time has really outdone itself. The choices: two tyrants who have worked tirelessly to line their own pockets while supressing human rights and democratic reforms; a flimflam man who has . . . hmmm . . . worked tirelessly to line his own pockets while living a well-chronicled, hypocritical life that is completely contradictory to the life he wants to force on you and me; a beloved author and huge commercial success; and an American war hero who is succeeding in an impossible situation despite incompetent leadership from the White House and weak-kneed undermining by the Democrat leadership. Being that this is Time, it should be no wonder that the "winner" is a Russian KGB tyrant.

Posted by Lucky Fabian in London UK
I think it is ridiculous that Time have appointed Putin as Person of the Year... He is nothing more than a gangster that rules on a massive scale. Shame on you Time Magazine.

Posted by mike pyszniak in windsor
Time magazine,are you the same magazine that made hitler and stalin the person of the year,I see you continue to exercise fine judgement with making Putin person of the year

Posted by JW in Milwaukee WI
Putin, a former head of the KGB, has a man poisoned to death in London, he sends weapons and advisors to Iran and Syria. to kill our troops and aids terrorist who continue to fire rockets into Israel on a regular basis. The fact is ; that information is never printed in your magazine proves that you and whom ever you claim is the "Man of the Year" are irrelevant. Lets see if Putin steps down after his term is over. Give the MOTY award to Walmart, since the income of Walmart is nearly as much as the entire Nation of Russia. They earned it, but since you favor Communist, and not Freedom you never would. If you printed Time in Russia, you would have to say he is the MOTY, or be shut down and controled like all of the State run media is in Russia. Good Job Comrad, we are all equal, but some are more equal than others.

Posted by David in St. George, Utah
Eunice...first and foremost..if you call yourself a Christian then do not start the name calling. Try to understand our comments. Most of the postings are not from "facists" but from angry Americans. I suggest to you, not to put your faith in man...Al Gore, but to put your faith in God. I state this with confidence because I am also a Christian with a family of three. I would love to see the environment saferponse>Posted by David in St. George, Utah
Eunice...first and foremost..if you call yourself a Christian then do not start the name calling. Try to understand our comments. Most of the postings are not from "facists" but from angry Americans. I suggest to you, not to put your faith in man...Al Gore, but to put your faith in God. I state this with confidence because I am also a Christian with a family of three. I would love to see the environment safer for my kids but if your putting your faith in a man who has huge agenda for himself then this is a mistake. I do not want to turn this posting blog into a religious agenda for me, you or others of faith but if you truly beleive the word of God then all these envirnmental issue are part of the larger plan. Take care and God Bless.

Posted by Can't Print Name in Tulsa, Oklahoma
I'm outraged by your selection of Putin, placing Al Gore in second place. Al Gore is a magnificent man and leader. Who on earth has had more impact on the world this year than he? He walks on water. You caved to conservatives. All of you need to accept he will go down in history as one of the greatest men of all time. As a colleague of mine just said, Time Magazine is a shadow of the publication it used to be -- Readers Digest in a larger format. I'm surprised you didn't pick Dick Cheney.

Posted by Eunice in To Tim Nelson in TN
You are misinformed about Al Gore friend. If you didn't know, this is for you:

10, 2005 —

In this week's "Cybershake," we take a look at some of the Internet luminaries who got a Webby, the Net's version of an Oscar, and how they said "thanks" -- in five words or less. Plus, we take note of how computer technology is being shunned in one professional sport. And the Webby Goes to ... Nine years ago, the Internet was still pretty much in its infancy. But a lot of people -- both well-known names and unsung heroes -- have helped shaped the Web to what it is today. And at the ninth annual international Webby Awards in New York this week, one particular Net figure finally received his due: Former Vice President Al Gore.

Officials at the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences honored Gore with the Webby Lifetime Achievement award in recognition of his pivotal role in the development of the Internet over the last 30 years.

Gore had been skewered during the 2000 presidential campaign for his remarks that suggested he was the Net's creator. But Vinton Cerf, one of the scientists who helped craft the actual Internet architecture, acknowledged that Gore was responsible for crafting important legislation and lending needed political support for "the information superhighway."

or you may want to have the link.. http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Cybershake/story?id=833922&page=1

So search for the real news before you drink the republican kool- aid. MORON..

Posted by Dave in Ft. Stewart Ga.
I can't beleive TIME!!!

This is very deja vue, in that in the 1930's, Time picked Adolph Hitler as Man of the year.

We should remember how that all worked out.

Putin has done more to destroy Russia's democratic potential than anyone else and destabilize the world further while he's at it, yet he's man of the year.

Good job boys. You picke yet another winner. Another good reason to drop the subscription.

Posted by Ron Shields in Afton Oklahoma
The person Time picked is exactly the one I would have guessed they would pick, one of their own.

Posted by Mike in Orlando
He, Must have ordered the article done. You are such Morons

Posted by Walter Bredy in Norman, Oklahoma
Of the first four peope you have to choose from, you select a KGB leader who is taking his country back to communism and naming his own successor? A man who is delivering uraniam to Iran. Who is selecting and on what qualification? What is wrong with this picture?

Posted by laurie seipel in douglas wy
Your comment Hell no you did not get it right! Where do you live? Russia. You chose a man that could very possibly be influentual some day in the future of ordering the deaths of U.S. soldiers, over a man that has steadfastley lead our troops in Iraq. What were you thinking? that you would distance your choice from the war? Your choice gets a thumbs bown and my money stays in my pocket.

Posted by Tim Nelson in Clarksville, TN
(Sorry, I forgot something) Regardless of who you choose in the years to come for your "Person of the Year", I will NEVER read your magazine again! You see, that's the great thing about us Americans, we have Freedoms, we can make that Choice! Too bad your person of the year doesn't allow that to happen.

Posted by Me in Anywhere
I think you people are a bunch of idiots for naming a soon to be communist dictator, Man of the Year. While I am fearful that this will happen, I hope it comes back to haunt you morons.

Yet another reason why i don't read you progressive, liberal slanted "rag-azine"

Posted by Eunice in To Tim Nelson in TN
You are misinformed about Al Gore friend. If you didn't know, this is for you:

10, 2005 —

or you may want to have the link.. http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Cybershake/story?id=833922&page=1

So search for the real news before you drink the republican kool- aid. MORON..

Posted by Dallas in Melbourne Beach
Time---you have finally made the top of my list. I have read you with respect. I seriously question your judgement on this person of the year. He is clearly trying to pave his way toward total control of a nation that I was brought up to fear and have learned to accept as a country no longer interested in detroying us. What were you thinking. Giving your nod to this egoist is like pouring gasoline on a fire. I respect your editorial priveledge but disagree with your choice. I do not disagree because he is Russian--I disagree because, regardless of nationality, he is a power monger and we have seen the results of that many times in history.

Yet another reason why i don't read you progressive, liberal slanted "rag-azine"

Posted by Your Name in Your City
Your comment- Disgusting lineup, simply validates my deciscion to cancel my subscription years ago.

Posted by Eunice- in Miami in -- Tim Nelson in TN
By the way, you should bow and THANK Al Gore you are typing and expressing your opinion on the Internet.

Posted by RK in USA
Al Gore sells snake oil, the World has had 17 global ice ages in the past,this is the only time someone has tried to make money off of it. If you notice a trend with the Liberals, ALL of the problems in the world can always be fixed If...... we just raise taxes more. Name a problem or a program that they dont try this on? NASA has release that the temperature on Mars and Europa have increased, so how can Man be responsible for that? But if they raise taxes enough, then they can solve that problem too.

Posted by Tim Nelson in to Eunice
HAHAHAHA, if al gore and the internet is what you read in my posting that (trying to watch my language here) upset you then my point was proven, the man is worthless. He takes sides and sticks by those sides, which I respect, but he hasn't done anything worthy of anybody's person of the year title. And by the way, I'm not republican, I'm not democrat, I'm not an independent, I'm simply an American who makes the best choice by looking at the PEOPLE, not the PARTY they belong to. and you're free to disagree with me, have a wonderful day!

Posted by Eunice- in Miami in -- Tim Nelson in TN
By the way, you should bow and THANK Al Gore you are typing and expressing your opinion on the Internet.

Posted by Richard Vetter in Chicago
Your comment: I am extremely, personally offended by Time's choice of Putin. Choosing Valdimir Putin as "Person of the Year" implies to many people that Time magazine thinks this THUG is admirable, or, at least accomplished in some meaningful way. Putin is an Ex-KGB man, almost assuredly responsible for untold deaths. He has absolutely no respect or feeling for civil liberties or human rights of any kind. Perhaps it's time for Time to discontinue its STUPID practice of electing "Person of the Year" if Putin is the best it can do.

Posted by Don G. Bell in Ridgecrest, California
It is easy to see why Time Magazine is headed for the dumper. To select a former head of the KGB, (who probably ordered the true torture of thousands of his countryman in the Gulags) while persecuting the CIA for months on end over 2 waterboarding incidents is absurd. Putin should be named Tyrant of the Year, not Man of the Year.

Posted by Michelle Nielson in Twin Falls
What is TIME thinking by naming this man Person of the Year!! I suppose if Hitler were alive you would have named him!! Let's take a look at all the other contenders....gee, they actually made a significant positive impression this last year but hey, that's not what this honor should be about. Let's put someone who is bringing Russia back to it's level as when Hitler ruled!!! I can imagine Putin's reaction to this! As if he wasn't insane enough in believing what he is doing is right, the U.S. now supports it as well! TIME actually honored a man who believes in murder, taking away a persons' right to civil liberties......how sick is that? I hope that this comes back to bite you in the *ss!!! Shame on you Time Magazine!!!

Posted by Tim Nelson in to Eunice
First of all I bow to NOBODY but God, and second, if I want to thank someone for the internet I'll thank they military since they are the ones that actually began what we know today as the world wide web.

Posted by David in St. George, Utah
Eunice... I suggest you step back from your keyboard and ask God to give you guidence rather than continuing the name calling. Remeber, your actions and name calling validates the non-believers belief that Christians are crazy in their beliefs.

Posted by Samuel in brazil
First,I would like to congratulate time for its courage to choose Putin as Person of the Year,choice that upset a LOT of people.Some say ''Oh,he is bad,communist,murderer,etc''.IT DOESN'T CARE.The election was not a popularity contest.It only says that Putin,with all his flaws,is the most powerful man alive,because of his independence of doing whatever he wants and because of the power given to him by a enormous country.Al Gore is a great man,but he doesnt have the power of the Russian.He carries a great message,and all his power is due to it and not to the ''man'' Al gore,but to the ''enviromentalist'' Al Gore.I am sure that General Petreaus is a great man,but he is just a loyal and competent employee of the U.S..Hu Jintao will become a powerful man in the days to come,becauseof the economical growth of China.Maybe he will shape the future,but now he is only a president of an emerging country.And Rowling WTF!?.She only wrote a couple of books!Why did you choose her?

Posted by Angry American in Watchtower, USA
I am in agreement with the nine out of ten of the comments. The Big Lib Media, of which you are a part, continually thumb your nose at the average citizen. You only appeal to the lemmings that buy into this crap. You are a news magazine, and the biggest news in more than a decade is that we are at war with a culture of death. Your recipient is aiding that effort. Do you think flattering them will make them less deadly? By your own criteria for the award, Patreus would walk away with it. And Bush before that.

Posted by marvin h in boulevard ca
Your comment I hope the iranians use putin's neuclear fuel to eliminate times head quarters. they can easily cross the border where the other iranians enter, east san diego county just south of tierra del sol.

Posted by Bronston Falcomiester in Venice, Maine
Al Gore--- what a hypocritical blowhard. His selection as a Nobel Prize winner completelydiscredits this award. The day that algore starts travelling coach and sells his mansions is the day I'll start following his doomsday prophesies. He is a dumb man ( dumber than W, by far ) and an empty suit. Liberalism is a far greater threat to the planet than this made up global warming fairytale.

Posted by arleen in west caldwell nj
YOu should have chosen "American Soldier" but I woudn't expect that from Time magazine. I don't even pick up your magazine in the doctors office, the only place I see your magazines these days...

Posted by Eunice in Miami
David, do you believe more than I do in God? Just wondering b/cause the "if you believe in God" comment. By the way, I am not calling anyone names.

Posted by Justin in PA
Yeah, dictators are awesome man!!

You f*cking idiots

Posted by Boris in Moscow, Russia
Typical Americans. You know nothing about Russia, Putin, KGB, GULag etc, yet you are so smug and full of yourself.

Posted by David in St. George, Utah
Eunice....how does someone believe more in God than someone else? I just beleive in God and Jesus as my savior and I do not put my faith in man which includes politicians and poiltical activists. Now it is time to go to work and be thankful for the day God has given me to do what I need to do to support my family. ..."Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working got the Lord, not for men, since you know that you will receive your inheritance from the Lord as a reward. It is the Lord Christ you are serving." Have a blessed Chrismas!!!

Posted by paz in phoenix
Your comment

Vladimir Putin may have most affected your news and your lives, TIME, but not ours.

Al Gore would have been a far better choice.

He is holding up a mirror, if we dare look, so we can see how what we do affects all life on this planet..."for good or ill".

Posted by Eunice in David, exactly what I thought
I just wanted to make sure i had misinterpreted your comment on whether you were questioning my beliefs. We might have different political views, but my faith in the lord and jesus is as strong as yours.

Have a save and blessed christmas to you too.

Posted by Mike in Ohio
Here's an idea: move your headquarters to Russia, where Putin will MAKE you pick him as Person of the Year, Person of the Decade, and Person of the Millenium.

How a magazine built on free speech can choose a leader who squashes that freedom just BLOWS MY MIND.

Posted by Your Name Belle Myers in Your City Zephyrhills, FL
Your comment

Dr. Charles Stanley of Atlanta, GA Man of God

Posted by Tyger COnner in Des Moines
Aye, I think you got it right. He seems to have been quite serious about getting his country back on track. I believe Petraeus should have been first runner-up. This man is remarkable. Thanks for your poll.

Posted by Roman in Moscow
to 1st comment by tj:

Oh, yes!!! I'm starving!!! Just illustration: http://gallery.greedykidz.net/get/351487/PC090107.JPG?g2_serialNumber=2

Posted by Candice Carter in Boston
I am disgusted with Time, and with Putin. Not sure who/what disgusts me more.

Posted by Tom in Dallas, TX
All your picks, as usual, are stupid and strictly to enhance the circulation of your magazine. Most are not deserving of the award. Money from sale ot Time is definetly your sole purpose. Try selecting deserving people who really contributed to the welfare of the world. Ex KGB thugs, etc. should not even be considered nor should one screaming dire global warming.

Posted by Jorge Valdes in Madison AL
I have to wonder how this crapy magazine sells at all in this country.

Posted by Don Thrash in St Louis, mo
Your comment

Ridiculous choice. But I did not expect any better from the Time.

Posted by Eunice in Your City
Well, apparently only "us" Americans are blind.. based on the Russians posts they are happy with their leader...

What gives?

Posted by Jan in New Orleans
I am dismayed for our future if the previous comments are sincere. Most commentators seemed clueless that the "person of the year" is not an award for positive achievement., but rather an acknowledgement of that person's influence.

Do they have any understanding of history instead of firing off knee-jerk opinions?

Secondly, two of these critics ( I didn't read them all--too depressing), in bashing the choice of Putin, spelled rogue as "rouge", meaning "red", and "intellegent" instead of the correct "intelligent."

What a dismal insight into our capacity for critical thinking and expository expression.

Posted by Mike Lockhart in Cincinnati, OH
I'm only surprised that the award didn't go to Osama bin Laden for his elusiveness. Too bad Saddam Hussein and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi are in hell- they could have been good candidates for Time.

Posted by KEVIN in KC
Your comment FOUR OF YOUR TOP FIVE AREN'T EVEN WORTH A COMMENT. TWO SOCIALIST AND A NUT. YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING ME........

Posted by Sergei in Russia
Heh, typical Americans. Years of brainwashing and blind hate.

Posted by MLV in Huntsville Al
I do not know about the rest of you. But as Americans we can send a message to Time by not buying their Magazine.

I think General Patreaus was cheated.

Posted by judan in denver
you need spend only one nite in the salt lake county jail to see the similiarities between the mormans and putin. you would not believe how the goon squad phisically destroys some of the mentally ill that they keep there. the morman creed: black is beutiful, tan is grand, but white is the color of the big boss man

Posted by Anna Ford in San Jose, CA
I will never read your magazine again.

Posted by Nestor Iwankiw in Chicago, IL
Time magazine should be ashamed of recognizing Putin in this manner. You clearly admit, consistent with the facts, that he has become the ruthless dictator of Russia, its new czar, with the goal of moving his country to a world power position and a most dangerous global menace.

That emerging deja-vu scenario in Russia of the old USSR aggressiveness, violation of human rights, creation of international turmoil and persistent Cold War tensions over past decades is certainly not something to be admired or honored. Putin is just another in a long historical line of opportunistic tyrannnical thugs who wield power at any cost, certainly not a laudable or remarkable achievement. Your Person of the Year candidates should only be those individuals who are widely distinguished, respected and have made important contributions to the advancement of humankind or the world.

Yes, almost any of your alternative choices for 2007 would have been enormously better and deserving than Putin.

Posted by Jim Garver in Temecula
You lost my magazine subscription some time ago and now you've lost all credibility by even considering Al Gore. To consider someone like him who is a hypocrite of the largest kind, espouses fuzzy science as fact, and is outright dishonest continues to reinforce your lack of any form of journalistist objectivity and a continuous love affair with radical liberals. This is a man who created a bogus business that conveniently overlooks a fundamental basis in science with his so called Carbon Credits scam and preaches "Do as I say, but I'm exempt" while wasting electricity in a mansion he never earned.

I'd rather see some unrecognized medic serving in Iraq or Afghanistan recognized as Person of the Year than your garbage choices!

Sincerely yours,

Jim Garver

Posted by Gil in HIISR
I disagree that Putin is chosen to be The man of the Year. you rewarded a person who is by far a symbol of corruption , who leads an aggressive governorship.

its lame and pathetic decision not to say -even dangerous act ,as for by giving a non-acceptable behaviour and ruling you legitimise ppl to act as such, all the more so had of states ..

Awful decision !!

Posted by vincent correra in san antonio
You have to be kidding - you must be trying to keep your office open in moscow or getting one of your employees to safety!!!!! Same stupid mistake that was made in Iraq, passing on propaganda just to stay in country. Why don't you move your headquarters to russia!!

Posted by Jc in Denvr
In the last days the bible says we make the bad just and the good bad. This approach of choice is only the beginning.

Posted by Desufag in DC
Why have you chosen Putin? He isn't American, he isn't black... He isn't even gay!

Posted by Steve in Atlanta
I think the nuclear issue was the dominant one of 2007 so TIME should have named someone else, but I can still see Putin as a logical choice. I have to laugh at some of the reader responses here.

Putin is a "communist" ? Where are you people getting this? Do you even know a damn thing about the man or his policies? Not ONE of them has anything to do with central planning or communism. He has no intention of restoring the USSR and has said anyone who wants to see it restored "has no brain".

Second, he his shipping weapons to Iran and Syria and killing American troops? Huh? Where are you getting this stuff? And please, the nuclear deal with Iran was BEFORE all the American war-mongering against Iran, they have every right to do business with them. If you think every country needs to stop doing business with anyone the U.S. doesn't like then sorry to say, you don't live in reality.

And judging by the majority of reader comments, none of you live in reality.

Posted by Dr B in Easton
You can't spell LEFTIST SLIME without TIME. You self-impressed idiots just don't get it; the 99% of America that deals with reality hates you and your anti-American ideals. Every week when I receive my complimentary copy of TIME it goes right where it belongs-- into the trash.

Posted by Anita Bushell in Orem, Utah
Your comment What in the HELL are you thinking! This is the biggest insult to the United States I have ever seen or heard of.! I'll bet Putin is laughing his butt off at you. I apologize to the President, our men and women who are fighting against people like this (who are going in the back door) to destroy us and YOU give them an award and more prestigious exposure. You should be run out of this country and be sent to live under this disguised dictator's rule. Then you can get a magazine up and running there and put Bush's picture on the front of that magazine as Person of the Year. But they would throw you in prison for that! What an idiot!

Posted by Joel in DFW
No, Time, you did not get it right. It doesn't surprise me that Al Gore is near the top of the list, but it does surprise me that Petraus made your top five. I don't really understand the Rowling pick, but she's pretty harmless. Many others have commented on the leader of the largest communist country. What is truly amazing is that you have chose Vladimir Putin as the Person of the Year. This is a man that is linked to the murders of many dissenters, thirteen of whom were reporters. Maybe this is the real reason you chose: Out of fear. Where were the questions about Andrei Kozlov, Anna Politkovskaya, and the rest. Maybe your reporter loses access to the Poloniun-210 vaccine if that part of the story gets published...

Posted by Gwen Ingram in Colorado Springs
Al Gore? What has he actually done for society, the world as a whole? Has he changed anything? He may have introduced awareness to a theory, but what has he personally done?

Posted by Betsey Cassell in Chicago, IL
I thought "Person of the Year" was an Honor? It now seems it's the person who strikes the most Fear in Our Hearts....Gee, How come Kim Jong IL wasn't on the list...? I would like to see someone who's noted for their Humanitarian Efforts...someone who's concerned about the planet, or perhaps someone concerned about our Childrens' Minds and did more for getting kids to read than any school program....or the people rebuilding New Orleans, or the volunteer army of men and women now returning to an indifferent VA, Government, and a nation that has no jobs and no housing....The U.S. TIME HAS BECOME OBSOLETE AS FAR AS i'M CONCERNED. You should change your name to REVENUE.....

Posted by The Rev. Fred Fenton in Concord, California
I strongly disagree with your choice of Putin. Al Gore should have been selected. Bush and Putin are threats to the planet. Gore is trying to save it.

Posted by Gil in HIISR
I disagree that Putin is chosen to be The man of the Year. you rewarded a person who is by far a symbol of corruption , who leads an aggressive governorship.

its lame and pathetic decision not to say -even dangerous act ,as for by giving a non-acceptable behaviour and ruling you legitimise ppl to act as such, all the more so had of states ..

Awful decision !!

Posted by Eunice in to Tim Nelson in TN
I am sorry but I couldn't pass or ignore your comment on the World Wide Web being invented by the Military..

The world wide web was created by Sir Tim Berners-Lee who worked at CERN in Geneva Switzerland.

and to your most likely suprise the turning point for the World Wide Web began with the introduction[] of the Mosaic web browser in 1991, a graphical browser developed by a team at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (NCSA-UIUC), led by Marc Andreessen.

Funding for Mosaic came from the High-Performance Computing and Communications Initiative, a funding program initiated by then-Senator Al Gore's High Performance Computing and Communication Act of 1991, also known as the Gore Bill.[10]

Allow me to inform you better of whom/why/when are the responsibles of the opportunities you are enjoying today when using the World Wide Web and internet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web

Like I said, and is once again proven, stop drinking the kool aid...

Posted by James Flambacher in America
TO: Judith Harris in Al Gore After reading your first paragraph, I thought you were talking about algore.

Posted by BL in Placerville
You certainly glorified a dictatorship, no wonder I toss out the offers to take your rag

Posted by Your Name in Your City
Your comment

Posted by R.T. Rhees in Las Vegas, NV
Unbelievable...it would appear that the common thread woven through your top three choices have mastered the art of smoke and mirrors--fictional democracy, fictional science, and just plain fiction.

Posted by Joe Dowd in Tampa florida
Your comment We could not have expected more from Time.A man that continues to depress freedom, former KGB, and censers free press. Yah great job Time.

Posted by Igor in Saint-Petersburg, Russia
lol @ most of the comments. Well i live in Russia and i can't say that Putin is some kind of hero or something but what the hell? "Live in fear" and comparsion with Hitler... Don't you think you all are just victims of some kind of propaganda or yellow press? What do YOU know bout Russia, Russians, our belifs and our choices? Well.. Congratulations with you ignorance. And well respect TIME for interesting article.

Sorry for my terrible english...

Posted by Eunice in Tim Nelson From TN
Read my comment three posts above yours..

Posted by Wendy Adler in ashburn va
I am disappointed that you did not add Sean Taylor to the list of tributes.

Posted by Susan in Allentown
I think you are a bunch of communists and should be soooo ashamed of yourselves.

Shame to you and your editors.

Person of the year should have been a soldier or a human rights activist, not a dictator.

I have not re-newed my subscription and now I am glad I didn't.

Posted by Gene McCallips in State College, PA
I must admit to being very puzzeled and not a little disappointed that you failed to choose Al Gore over someone who has displayed a blatant hunger for power and disregard for human rights. As a registered Republican, I can honestly say that my frustration doesn't have political roots. Rather from a moral position, I would have chosen Al Gore over Vladimir Putin. I admire the fact that Al Gore has displayed a tenacity and respect for the US political system even though there are many who doubt that the same system treated him fairly. It is indeed unfortuante that Time magazine seems to have made it's choice for reasons which have something other than an ethical or moral basis.

Posted by Eunice in Igor from Russia
Yes, we are fed the propaganda everyday. And although I don't agree with Putin as first choice( i thought Al Gore, who is American should have been the one), i can't help to laugh at all the republican propaganda being thrown here.

You see, America has become, just as the same as what all these people are trying to say about Russia..

Posted by Gary Whitson in Bluff City Tn.
You people must be in league with the new world Govt. CFR/Tri-Lateralists to have done something so stupid and brazen. Imagine naming a communist/killer/pedophile as the person of the year. you people should all be tried for treason.nothing has changed in the soviet union and you all know it.the same old men still run the country, they just stay behind the lines now, kinda like the CFR.not many folks know that the CFR actually run this country, not the President.

Posted by Scott in Bristol, Pa.
How can any sane person state that Putin represents stability? Handing Iran enriched uranium de-stablilizes the whole region,and therfore, the world. The only reason for the editors for this choice is to get shock ratings. If they really believe this choice for the reasons stated, they should reside with their "Man of the Year"

Posted by Eunice in To Gene McCallips in PA
What an Honest post. I admire people like you. Seeing beyond political parties is beyond admiration.

There definetely should be more of you in this country.

Miami, FL

Posted by Joe Dowd in Tampa florida
Your comment We could not have expected more from Time.A man that continues to depress freedom, former KGB, and censers free press. Yah great job Time.

Posted by Gary Whitson in Bluff City Tn.
P.S. Something i need to mention also: down in the comments someone wrote that you all are f**^ing idiots. I AGREE. YOU ARE INDEED.

Posted by SP in Chelyabinsk, Russia
I also find most of the comments here ridiculous. Don't believe all the stuff your government (or your media) is trying to put into your head! Come to Russia, see it for yourselves, talk to Russian people and then say if your original views were proven. I believe I have the right to say that the American media (at least, most of them) cannot be called unbiased and free. I've been to the US 8 times, I watch American news channels and can see for myself and compare the various prospectives. What do you base your judgements on? Bush's speeches? Articles in The Washington Post? Have you read a single article in a Russian newspaper? Have you seen a single Russian TV show? If not, how can you draw such conclusions?

Posted by David Laky in Whitehall, PA
You people are out of your collective minds. Really. He cares nothing about civil liberties or the people of his country. The country is run by mob unions and underhanded activities and you call that stability? Same goes for your 3rd choice and your 2nd choice is as appalling as the fact the Gore won a Nobel Prize. If he practiced what he preached it would be different. This is insanity. This is why our country will one day "give itself away". Let's lift up the people who deserve to be lifted up and not tolerate the people who have no respect for human lives. Seriously, this speaks volumes about your coverage of world events and the political skew behind your operations - and of course your desire to sell magazines. There is not one solid reason for the top three choices. None. I hope you people can look yourselves in the mirror when you wake up in the morning. Maybe you should think about the mothers and children in Russia and China and put your families in their places? Then cast your vote... I should have my head examined for even taking the time to comment on this insanity.

Posted by Iggy in Russia
Good choice, Time! To "tj in amarillo". Have you been here in Russia? No? Why I am not suprised...

Posted by Brett in Huntsville, AL
Time editors and writers must have co-oped for Pravda

Posted by Richard Romero Sorensen, J.D. in Healdsburg, California
II understand your choice, but I candidly almost experienced physical illness and anger at Putin's selection. Al Gore unequivocally receives my vote for Person of the Year, based upon Time's criteria. For him to share the Runner-Up Position with Petraeus & Ms. Potter is insult to injury. I compliment Time on providing the consumer this forum to respond and/or vent. I do not want to expend any more effort justifying my position - but I will say that Time does make a wordly difference with this feature each year. I am happy with the Internet and your availability, as then I need not purchase the magazine throughout the year.

Posted by Earl Geddes in OVERLAND PARK
What a load of crap! Since we're in the middle of WW IV (WW III = Cold War), the persons of the year should have been the men and women of the US military. They're the ones that put their lives on the line everyday to guarantee our freedoms and way of life. However, since the award is titled person of the year, my choice would have been General Petraeus. Putin and China's leader are dictators, Gore is the blowhard leader of a new age religion, and JK Rowling is a fraud.

Posted by Gene B in NJ
Your selection was spot on. Here in the States, we have seen little in the press of the amazing transformation going on in Russia. Putin is probably the world's greatest head of state, and the people in Russia know it. Russia will soon be the only country that is truly Christian. Putin in a sincere Orthodox Christian believer, and his support of moral programs is exactly what Russia needs to survive.

It is we in the States, going down the double tubes of imperialism and immorality, who have the problems! Americans WAKE UP!

Posted by Nobody cares what TIME thinks in Vegas
Time = National Inquirer

This is exactly the kind of slimey stunt that has regulated Time to the same bottom-feeding category of the National Inquirer.

Putin represents the worst kind of evil, murdering monster ever to soil the planet with his presence, and he represents the greatest threat to the free world over Iran, China, and all the others.

No wonder your subscriptions continues to dwindle down nothing, and your publication continues the slide down to utter obscurity.

Posted by Eddie Schneider in New York, NY
I agree with your choice for Person of the Year, but couldn't you have found a writer with a better ability to structure your editorial opinion?

Muddy thinking which pervaded the article. It seems as if the author of the opinion couldn't decide which he was more frightened of: offending Putin, or offending the American public, and trying to treat both delicately resulted in an embarrassingly bad article.

Posted by Eddie Schneider in New York, NY
I agree with your choice for Person of the Year, but couldn't you have found a writer with a better ability to structure your editorial opinion?

Muddy thinking pervaded the article. It seems as if the author of the opinion couldn't decide which he was more frightened of: offending Putin, or offending the American public, and trying to treat both delicately resulted in an embarrassingly bad article.

Posted by Nobody cares what TIME thinks in Vegas
Time = National Inquirer

This is exactly the kind of slimey stunt that has regulated Time to the same bottom-feeding category of the National Inquirer.

Putin represents the worst kind of evil, murdering monster ever to soil the planet with his presence, and he represents the greatest threat to the free world over Iran, China, and all the others.

No wonder your subscriptions continues to dwindle down nothing, and your publication continues the slide down to utter obscurity.

Posted by konstantin in Russia
Bland imperialism here in the comments (well, few people are sane). Come on, Mr. Putin.

Posted by TIME hiding from calls in DC
It's very telling that the COWARDS at TIME who made this slection of "Scum of the Year" are HIDING in their offices and refusing to take any calls from an outraged public.

Posted by Gil in HIISR
I disagree that Putin is chosen to be The man of the Year. you rewarded a person who is by far a symbol of corruption , who leads an aggressive governorship.

its lame and pathetic decision not to say -even dangerous act ,as for by giving a non-acceptable behaviour and ruling you legitimise ppl to act as such, all the more so had of states ..

Awful decision !!

Posted by Ann in Plattsburgh
Excellent choice. Person of the Year doesn't have to be someone who is "safe" to talk about around the watercooler.

Posted by Jerry B in Gaithersburg, Maryland
Putin is a dictator, but then so was Hitler, Time's "Man of the Year" for 1939. I would have chosen the Burmese Monks, but who am I?

Posted by Opinion Aplenty in New York
I applaud the Times Maganzine for picking such an unpopular person as Vladimir Putin as "Person of the Year". It was a gutsy move knowing that the choice will reflect on the poor magazine sale. Mr. Putin did not do anything for the Russian people or for rest of the world. This also hold true for other runner-ups. The two names that comes to mind is General Petraeus and Al Gore. I would have voted for General Petraeus in a nano second if he had kicked some butts in Afghanistan and not in Iraq. Without any question, he is a great soldier, but his talent is being used in the wrong place for wrong agenda. That leaves Al Gore. For those people who said he didn't do anything, he has, at least, bought the global warming to the world attention. Nations around the world are more aware of pollutions affecting climate change than before. This outcome alone should have put Al Gore on the Time's cover.

Posted by Debbie in Killeen
You have GOT to be kidding? You could not possibly see Putin as a person worthy of the "person of the year"! Why did Time do this? And - Jenna - President Bush? Protecting our country? By making stronger enemies in the Middle East? Where is the positive role model for us to look up to, Time?

Posted by Your Name in Your City
TIME SUCKS

Posted by W. J. STEVENS in TULSA
I would rather find the good in people than dwell on the negative character. I agree with you on your choice simply because Mr. Putin has brought Russia out of destruction and has stood his ground doing so. He doesn't need our Liberal input in bringing about the major changes taking place. I don't agree with some of his methods but he is the one dealing with the Russian people and he knows them best.

I found myself agreeing with an a lot his responses to your questions and especially to the one about luck. I agree whole heartedly with him. There is more to admire about him than we have been informed of. Why couldn't you have made your interview more widely available to the masses?

On the other side, I am so thankful that your 2nd choice was flopped on us to gag on! Oh, please enough of Al Gore for a life time. When he starts taking what he is telling everyone else about the atmosphere of our planet, then maybe what he says will mean something to the rest of us.

You did good in your choice but I would never have considered him with the understanding of the man I have had all of this time. That conversation changed my opinion greatly.

My choice would have been Tony Blair and he wasn't even in consideration. So what do I know about importance? But he has accomplished a lot for this generation and of course some of it is subject to disapproval but then, isn't that the way real humans are.

Good choice!

Posted by Jon Woodrum in Richmond, Va.
Time could not have made a worse choice. This will be spun by Putins autocratic regime as approval of his actions in suppressing descent. I can't wait to hear how Time will respond when Putin assumes the Presidency for life under the guise of maintaining order and stability

Posted by Reggie Gremillion in Baton Rouge
Leave it to Time to choose the former head of the KGB and the man who just took down democracy in Russia as its Person of the Year.

You people are disgusting.

Sorry for my terrible english...

Posted by Rudolph Girandola in Upper Freehold, New Jersey
Your comment: Why do I say "Same Old! Same Old!" when it comes time for Time to name the "Person of the Year". Your constant habit of ruling out real American Patriots or people of values and morals is annoying and suspect. You've selected a man, Putin, who may have murdered dozens of people as a KGB Agent. Or it's possible he may become one of America's formidable antagonist. What's next? Osama Bin Laden or, maybe, Sean Penn? Hey! There's always Fidel. Or did you? I think he might have been named Person of the Year a while back. And so, "Time Marches On" Remember that one?.....Rudolph J. Girandola Author: The Jade Chalice (A fictional look at why scandals plague the Roman Catholic Church)

Posted by Alan in Orlando
I was pleased and surprised with your choice of Person of the Year. It just reflects how honestly unbiased and clearminded YOU the decision makers at TIME really are.

- Note: For those with their utopian heads in the sand... this is sarcasm -

There was probably an era when the employees of TIME held their heads up high and proudly stated, "I work for TIME Magazine!" Now, sadly, they can't - lest the tarnished reputation of their employer stain their own personal image.

It's idocy like this that really boosts those subscription sales. I guess someone needed to take the place of the World Weekly News.

How embarrassing.

Posted by J Sargent in Atkinson NH
He may be a presence in the world but your selections for Man of the Year shows how out of touch you are with your readers. This guy is despicable. You should consider that he would restrict your free speech if you where a Russian based magazine. You guys are idiots of the first order.

Posted by Deborah E. Bruen in Connecticut
Your comment Just when I thought the liberal press couldn't get any "wackier", Time magazine selects a "neo-Communist" as their person of the year. Oh, yes, it was probably done to solicit much email and furor. You succeeded in this venue. But, let it be known that, as soon as my school's subscription (to Time magazine) runs out, I will not be renewing. (My position in the school is the Head Librarian responsible for ordering periodicals and text, as well as on-line databases.) I am disappointed that you could not choose someone who has added value to our lives, perhaps the men and women who fight for our freedoms, a doctor or health professional who is truly searching for life saving remedies, you get the picture, I'm sure.

Posted by Bruce R. Dunlap in Boca Raton
No wonder people don't read your magazine. Couple this with your "most influential " list and you finish first on the "clueless list."

Posted by Linnda Kurz in San Jacinto, CA
Your comment: What are you thinking? A dictator who consorts with our enemies. A person who honed his human rights skills in the KGB. Now I know why I do not read your periodical. Shame on you and your esteemed selection board.

Posted by J Dani in Kalamazoo, MI
I see that most of you haven't read what it says above:

"TIME's Person of the Year is the person or persons who most affected the news and our lives, for good or ill, and embodied what was important about the year."

It's not about who did the most good. It's about who has affected the world the most this year. Even Hitler was Person of the Year once.

Posted by Eloise in Palm Bay Florida
I would vote for Oprah, not only does she Walk the walk, she Talks the talk as well!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by Rick Bouwens in Lindstrom, Minnesota
Unbelievable!!!! Your magazine has undoubtedly secured its status as a rag worthy to be placed on the racks right next to the National Enquirer. Thank Gog I don't have a subscription.

Posted by igor betancur in saratov, russia
to tell the truth i don't really care much about our president or about his party or something.. i haven't spoken english for ages but what you americans post here in comments is just such a bullshit and i can't stop smiling.. it seems like someone tells you all the time about vvp's beeing dictator, about him treating his people etc.. come here and explore russia by yourselves instead of repeating what most of you have posted here just like you're talking dolls who know only one phrase god bless you

Posted by phil in bakersfield, ca
you don't give a rats ass what i think. let's make that clear. when i found out i was actually speechless. there's no rhyme or reason or justification for choosing putin. this s.o.b. will cut, and probably has, your heart out and then have it for lunch. the news of this last week was that an opponent is in a psychiatric ward for his "own" protection. it anyone believe's that i've got some beach front property in arizona. what a crock. k.b.g. agent anyone!! fuck you time.

You did good in your choice but I would never have considered him with the understanding of the man I have had all of this time. That conversation changed my opinion greatly.

Good choice!

You did good in your choice but I would never have considered him with the understanding of the man I have had all of this time. That conversation changed my opinion greatly.

Good choice!

Posted by Tim in Chicago suburbs
I generally agree with the selection, but I am shocked by the comments - those who compare V.V. Putin with Hitler or use words like "communism" in the post are clueless - they are just comics readers. I doubt they have read the article where you explain your choice. I did not expect such a selection and I think I will get the subscription.

Posted by Dick West in Westfield,NJ
Putin? please! stomping on others is all he knows. Shame on Time.

And Al Gore, the man(?) with the childs temper,wow, he really loves his country based on all the good things he says about us while on foreign soil. Hey, maybe he's related to Jimmie bad mouthing Carter. Oh well.

Posted by Greg McBride in San Antonio Tx
If Stability is your Primary measure, then all the greatest Dictators of History will be at the top of your list. Since Fear and Consequence keeps most mere mortals in their place, and their tongues quiet. If Influence is your secondary measure, then all the greatest terrorists, people behind the inquistions, and the constant preying upon the meek, will surely find their way onto your list. I am not saying that you are wrong in your judgements, however, As a Race, we should attempt to remove the spotlight from those, that see their acts of horror, as a method to bring the spotlight onto themselves. Power for Powers sake, is surely a blight upon our world.

Posted by Ted in Brooklyn
Your choices for "person of the year" and the runner-ups are neither provocative nor well-conceived. Rather, they are asinine and, in the case of Algore, transparent and agenda-oriented. Your choices of Putin and Jintao as runner up, rank up there with Arafat winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Your choice of Gore as one of the runners-up ranks right up there with ... well, with Gore winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Rowling? Don't get me started on that socially trendy literary flake. Keep going, TIme, keep insulting the intelligence of the American people. Soon you and the NY Times can go hand-in-hand into the wild blue yonder (or whatever color the sky is in your Bizarro world). Can you say "readership plunge"?

Posted by carmen in miami
I have no words :(

Posted by N.Muss in Circleville OH
Once again, you've out done yourselves! I'm sorry to say I was once a subscriber. The only finalist that deserved it was the General. I bet even Putin can't believe it.

Posted by Kelly in Dallas, TX
Your comment Unbelievable!!!! I could care less about your dumb magazine, and never, ever would purchase it in a million years. I saw your choice on my computer news and just could not understand why so many, who have so much, due to the freedoms we have in this country, choose to glorify nations and leaders who would never let them succeed in their countries. You think your opinions are worth so much, try selling your thoughts for a paycheck in some of these countries you seem to idolize. Your desire to somehow shame America shows how little you really understand about the world we live in and REAL life. Your magazine and its writers are a pathetic excuse for journalism or even story telling. I wish all of you America haters would just give back your citizenship and go live in these "worldly havens" you so admire. You suck!