Tuned In, TV Blog, Television Reviews, James Poniewozik, TIME

World, This Is America. America, Have You Met the World?

frei_web.jpg
Matt Frei, international anchor of mystery. Sean McCormick / BBC Worldwide

The title of BBC World News America needs a comma between "News" and "America." As in: This is what world news looks like, America. Do you remember it?

I exaggerate slightly, but last night's inaugural newscast on BBC America was relatively light on the "America" and heavy on the world news that has famously been disappearing from American media outlets, on TV and elsewhere. And while this serious but stylish broadcast is not going to challenge Brian, Charlie and Katie anytime soon, I wouldn't be surprised if there turns out to be a decent, international-news-starved audience for the show. [Update: There is, of course, the CNN International hour on CNN. It just spent three minutes on Britney Spears' losing custody of her kids.]

The newscast, anchored by Matt Frei, kicked off with long reported pieces from Sudan and Burma (a name that the BBC, whether out of habit or charming colonial nostalgia, continues to prefer to Myanmar). It followed with long interview with former Pakistani leader Benazir Bhutto, and another, with Laura Bush, that focused largely on international issues. There were a few domestic stories as well, but they--such as one on the John Edwards campaign in Iowa--felt more perfunctory and elementary to someone who follows U.S. political news regularly. (A little like reading the U.S. news in the Economist.)

Not to belabor the comparison with The PBS NewsHour--which isn't a for-profit competitor--but the long pieces on World News America resembled PBS' format more than the network evening news', with the important exception that the BBC news had more reported segments and fewer in-studio talking heads. (A function, I would assume, of the BBC News organization's bigger bankroll.) Like PBS, the BBC newscast also places less emphasis on flashy visuals, yet the BBC has always been good at putting non-telegenic stuff (phone interviews, etc.) in a crisp, contemporary package--its graphic designers know what they're doing.

Substantively, the show's interviewers seem to have a more aggressive, pugnacious style than the sometimes punch-pulling PBS crew. Frei, for instance, pushed Bhutto relentlessly on the question of whether, if restored to power, she would let the U.S. military grab bin Laden on Pakistani soil--a touchy hypothetical she did her best to dodge. (She'd have to say the evidence that they knew where he was, she said. Let's assume it's overwhelming, he pressed. Well, she'd prefer that Pakistan handle the job itself, but if necessary, they might co-operate--So that's a yes? he pushed.)

However it's packaged, of course, the audience for an international news broadcast on a digital cable station is probably small. But not necessarily worthless. The advertising for the first night of the show assumed a wealthy niche audience: Lexus, Credit Suisse, India and Qatar tourism. BBC World News America may be brand-new, but it already achieved one victory over the Americans. Those all beat Metamucil.

| Sphere Related Blogs & Articles |

Reader Comments (8)

Keith:

I regret to inform you that I will not be able to watch the BBC World News America program. The all powerful talking heads on radio and TV that costantly repeat the talking points have said that the BBC is a tool of Islamic terrorists.

Karma:

I've recently started listening to World Pod and News Pod Podcasts from the BBC and am AMAZED at their interviewer style. At one point one of them was talking to a member of Parliament in England and actually interruped the man and said "No sir, that's not true." and then the guy continued talking and he interrupted once more and said "No, that's just not true." I was stupified.

It's nice to see marginally real journalism.

Siddhartha:

Sorry, I can't watch BBC News either because since it doesn't have the decency of giving us updates on Britney's kids instead of giving harrowing updates on our war, sorry 'conflict', they are actively not supporting our troops in a time of need.

Keith:

@Karma, That happens all the time in US news....just watch Hannity and O'Reilly interrupt their guests and tell them how wrong they are. What? They're entertainers and not journalists? Well, nevermind then. ;)

We appreciate the review. An explanation of our policy on place names changes - Burma/Myanmar can be read here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/10/name_changes.html

thanks, Jeremy Hillman, Editor, BBC World

Nick S:

"Those all beat Metamucil."

Either the demo for network news is the old and bowel-clogged, or Americans are a nation of the constipated.

But yes, it's a crisper package than earlier attempts. I still like the unvarnished three-hour BBC World feed in the morning, but the basic good habits of presentation are there: the format of foreign dispatches, the reluctance to do gratuitous live correspondent shots for fake 'authority', the World Service-style prioritisation of stories. (Alas, the BBC's domestic news gets more Americanised every time I return home.)

Danois:

Hi James

Interesting article. As an Australian, it's intriguing to hear about how news is presented in the US.

By the way, Time has the same policy on the question of what to call Burma.

"The junta that runs the country imposed a systematic name change several years ago, decreeing that Burma was to be called Myanmar and the capital Rangoon was to be Yangon. The opposition has never accepted these changes; neither has the U.S. government. TIME continues to use Burma and Rangoon."

Is Time also engaging in charming colonial nostalgia? ;)

James Poniewozik:

@Danois: We do, but only for nations we actually colonized.

Seriously, though, I was mainly trying to point out, tongue in cheek, a discrepancy to many readers in the US, where more and more news organizations (The NY Times, e.g.) have been using "Myanmar," "Myanmar, the former Burma" or somesuch.

Unfortunately, it's become one of those linguistic battles, like "pro-life vs. pro-choice," in which partisans will hold that choosing one wording means choosing sides, there is no neutrality, etc., etc.--all of which makes me glad I write about sitcoms about cavemen.

Post a comment


About Tuned In

Tuned In

James Poniewozik writes TIME magazine's Tuned In column, about pop culture and society. Tuned In, the blog version, is about the stuff we used to call "TV," whether it's in your living room, on your computer or--once the networks figure out the technology and line up the advertisers--in your dreams themselves.

 RSS Feed

AddThis Feed Button

Daily Email

Get Tuned In in your inbox and never miss a day:
 
Delivered by   FeedBurner


advertisement

Tuned In Archives

July 2008
Choose a day to view events.

<< Previous Months

    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31