>
Work in Progress, Worklife, Workplace, TIME

Never mind office romance. Fear the collenemy

I'm coining a word. Colleague + enemy = collenemy (rhymes with frienemy). Now that I write it, it sounds vaguely gastrointestinal. I perhaps ought to have consulted this instructional on Wikihow that teaches you how to make up nonsense words.

I've had some collenemies in my day. At the financial trade magazine where I worked as an editor, I shared an office with another editor whom I at first considered a friend. He was sweet, ingratiating and good at his job. But he was also competitive. When he overheard me taking a call for a freelance article I was penning on the side for The New York Times, what did he do? Yep: he trotted right over and told our boss.

Our boss called me in. I sweated. Lucky for me, the boss was a really nice man who understood my yearning to write. He was also a narcoleptic. Seriously. In the middle of his half-hearted butt whupping, he fell asleep. My boss and I got along great during the few months I remained there before I was hired away by Money magazine (whose editor had read that article in the NYT and hunted me down).

But my relationship with my colleague never recovered. He was forever my collenemy. Our formerly collegial, even warm, work environment turned icy and uncomfortable. That certainly contributed to my hasty exit.

In the run-up to Valentine's Day, I'm getting a lot of press releases about surveys and books on office romance. But it's the toxic teammate who's the bigger worry, says John Challenger of Chicago outplacement and career coaching firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. Bad blood between coworkers can lead to "a wide variety of workplace problems, ranging from lost productivity and higher turnover to increased and open hostility." He adds:

University of Washington Business School doctoral student William Felps and professor Terence Mitchell analyzed about two dozen published studies that focused on how teams and groups of employees interact, and specifically how having bad teammates can destroy a good team. They found that a single “toxic” or negative team member – someone who does not do his or her fair share of work, is chronically unhappy and emotionally unstable, or who bullies or attacks others – can be the catalyst for workplace dysfunction.

The researchers found,

In one study of approximately 50 manufacturing teams, Felps and Mitchell discovered that teams with one disagreeable or irresponsible member were much more likely to experience conflict, poor communication, and a lack of cooperation between teammates, all of which led to poor team performance.

Another study by researchers at the University of North Carolina identified the "consequences of workplace incivility":

In the survey of 1,400 workers, 53 percent of respondents lost work time worrying about a past or future confrontation with a coworker. More than one-third (37 percent) said a hostile confrontation caused them to reduce their commitment to the organization, and 22 percent said they put less effort into their work because of a confrontation. Twelve percent were compelled to leave the employer following the confrontation.

So, managers: never mind the couple performing tonsil hockey by the ladies' room—other than to Lysol the heck out of the stapler she recently borrowed. It's not the office nookie you need to watch; it's the office smackdown. Be afraid of the collenemy. Be very afraid.


| Sphere Related Blogs & Articles |

Reader Comments (7)

Rhea:

You are right about this. I've had much more anxiety over crap bosses and weird co-workers than any romance thing. This reminds me of the work of Steve Johnson, who has written a book on Microinequities. These are subtle putdowns, snubs, dismissive gestures, or sarcastic tones that can undercut employee performance and otherwise make someone miserable. Interesting stuff.

Rhea:

Oops, not Steve Johnson. I meant Steve Young.

Prklypear:

Absolutely! Office romance is awkward at best, an office enemy can make your work day miserable! Whereas romance strives to be discreet (we hope), enemies stab you in the back at every turn, often in the presence other coworkers. Forget about teamwork...everyone lives in fear that they'll be the next target.

Gerry Author Profile Page:

So Lisa, what did you say to your tattle-taler of a coworker? I hope you gave him at least an icy stare. And when you left, did you tell him that your on-the-sly Times article won you a new job? I hope so.

The consequences of envy are many and varied and this is one of them. As long as there are people around us like in a work environment, it'll be difficult to avoid it, unless you previously know who your "collenemy" is.

hrwench Author Profile Page:

I wouldn't call him competitive. I'd call him an a-hole and a tattle-tale. The manager should have asked him, "Do you expect to be rewarded for tattling?" and then sent him on his way.
For a great read on workplace a-holes check out Bob Sutton's "The No A-hole Rule" (Normally I don't censor a title but since I'm commenting on someone else's blog I'm trying to be respectful!). Bob also has a great blog called Work Matters at http://bobsutton.typepad.com/my_weblog/. He is a professor at Stanford and an all around cool guy!

Dr. Rick Kirschner:

I love the new word Collenemy, and the idea of toxicity associated with this person leads naturally to the idea of a collenema. But I do not believe that labeling someone as toxic leads to a likely change in outcome. In fact, in the moment of blaming a person for their bad behavior, you run the risk of giving up your leverage to change the situation. That's because the act of blame makes a victim of the blamer. Better, I think, to choose a frame of reference that leads to a different result. Yes, it can be satisfying to hold someone else accountable for the way you let yourself be effected, but it is NOT effective, and merely feeds into the self fulfilling prophecy of "See what dealing with her did to me?" In my research on the subject, I found that effective behavior when dealing with bad behavior begins with making useful assumptions rather than limiting ones. So call it what you like, but how you react to what you call it is the beginning of how resourceful you are in dealing with it!

Post a comment


About Work In Progress

Lisa Takeuchi Cullen
Nina Subin

Lisa Takeuchi Cullen is a staff writer for TIME. She blogs about work. Why? Because TV was taken. Think of her as the grumpy colleague ranting by the water cooler.
More about the Author

Email her here:
lisa_cullen at timemagazine.com

 RSS Feed

AddThis Feed Button

Daily Email

Get Work in Progress in your inbox and never miss a day:
 
Delivered by   FeedBurner

advertisement

Work In Progress Archives

May 2008
Choose a day to view events.

<< Previous Months

        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31